From: AARG! Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Think about it: this one innocuous little box holding the TPME key could
ultimately be the root of trust for the entire world. IMO we should
spare no expense in guarding it and making sure it is used properly.
With enough different interest groups
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Anonymous User wrote:
This program can be used by anonymous contributors to release partial
information about their identity - they can show that they are someone
from a list of PGP key holders, without revealing which member of the
list they are. Maybe it can help in
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:25:40PM -0700, AARG!Anonymous wrote:
Several people have objected to my point about the anti-TCPA efforts of
Lucky and others causing harm to P2P applications like Gnutella.
The point that a number of people made is that what is said in the
article is not workable:
I don't try to filter, but to join several sources. Anonymous is an idiot,
but at least an intelligent one. I can't leave him out without creating a
skewed picture of what is going on.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 1:03 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Some anonymous, and now apparently
hi,
Here is an example illustrating turing thesis
{ Suppose we make a conjecture that a turing machine
is equal to the power of a typical digital
computer?how can we defend or refute sucha hypotheis?
to defend it we could take an increasingly more
difficult and show that they are solvable
I asked Eric Murray, who knows something about TCPA, what he thought
of some of the more ridiculous claims in Ross Anderson's FAQ (like the
SNRL), and he didn't respond. I believe it is because he is unwilling
to publicly take a position in opposition to such a famous and respected
figure.
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:25:40 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right, as if my normal style has been so effective. Not one person has
given me the least support in my efforts to explain the truth about TCPA
and Palladium.
Hal, I think you were right on when you wrote:
But
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
AARG! Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lucky Green wrote:
Ray wrote:
If I buy a lock I expect that by demonstrating ownership I
can get a replacement key or have a locksmith legally open it.
It appears the days when this was true are waning. At
Here is the signature block from the ring signature program which got
truncated. I'll try sending it through a few different anon remailers
until it gets through. Replace the lines from the earlier posting
starting with the END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK line.
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 19:30:09 -0700
From: AARG!Anonymous [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re the debate over whether compilers reliably produce identical object
(executable) files:
The measurement and hashing in TCPA/Palladium will probably not be done
on the file itself, but on the executable content
10 matches
Mail list logo
