James A. Donald writes:
Further, genuinely secure systems are now becoming available, notably
Symbian.
What does it mean for Symbian to be genuinely secure? How was this
determined and achieved?
--
http://www.eff.org/about/staff/#chris_palmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I very much doubt it. Where did that factor of half come frome.
During lulls, you are constantly sending chaff packets. On average,
you're halfway through transmitting a chaff packet when you want to
send a real one. The system has to wait for it to finish before
sending another. QED.
Ah,
Bill Stewart wrote:
When I saw the title of this thread,
I was assuming it would be about getting Mozambique
or Sealand or other passports of convenience or coolness-factor
like the Old-School Cypherpunks used to do :-)
Actually the only passports that are significantly more
convenient than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Gutmann wrote:
Gregory Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As for applying for one now, I think the deadline for the non-RFID passwords
is about 3 days away (31 Oct 2005), but I could be wrong. (In other words, if
your application is not in
Modes that are based on a small window of previous plaintext, such as
OFB, would be vulnerable too.
My mistake, OFB does not have this property. I thought there was a
common mode with this property, but it appears that I am mistaken.
If it makes you feel any better, you can consider the PRNG
Chris Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
James A. Donald writes:
Further, genuinely secure systems are now becoming available, notably
Symbian.
What does it mean for Symbian to be genuinely secure? How was this determined
and achieved?
By executive fiat.
Peter.
James A. Donald writes:
Further, genuinely secure systems are now becoming available, notably
Symbian.
Chris Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does it mean for Symbian to be genuinely secure? How was this
determined and achieved?
There is no official definition of genuinely secure, and it is
