Re: Thanks, Lucky, for helping to kill gnutella (fwd)

2002-08-11 Thread R. A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 4:12 AM + on 8/11/02, David Wagner wrote: I hope I don't need to point out that always using the same exit remailer does *not* prove that he is using just one hop. One can hold the exit remailer fixed while varying other hops in the

Re: Thanks, Lucky, for helping to kill gnutella (fwd)

2002-08-11 Thread R. A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 9:15 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Eugen Leitl wrote: I don't try to filter, but to join several sources. Anonymous is an idiot, but at least an intelligent one. I can't leave him out without creating a skewed picture of what is going on. No

Re: Thanks, Lucky, for helping to kill gnutella (fwd)

2002-08-11 Thread David Wagner
R. A. Hettinga wrote: [Ob Cypherpunks: Seriously, folks. How clueful can someone be who clearly doesn't know how to use more than one remailer hop, as proven by the fact that he's always coming out of the *same* remailer all the time? I hope I don't need to point out that always using the same

Re: Thanks, Lucky, for helping to kill gnutella (fwd)

2002-08-10 Thread Eugen Leitl
I don't try to filter, but to join several sources. Anonymous is an idiot, but at least an intelligent one. I can't leave him out without creating a skewed picture of what is going on. On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, R. A. Hettinga wrote: At 1:03 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Some anonymous, and now apparently

Re: Thanks, Lucky, for helping to kill gnutella (fwd)

2002-08-09 Thread R. A. Hettinga
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 1:03 AM +0200 on 8/10/02, Some anonymous, and now apparently innumerate, idiot in my killfile got himself forwarded to Mr. Leitl's cream of cypherpunks list: They will protect us from being able to extend trust across the network. As Dan Geer