Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-09 Thread Cypher Piggie
shutup juan your post is worthless



Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-09 Thread Cypher Piggie
> Ignoring trolls is the best policy.

sending juan virus for his lil troll dick is best polecy
make sure is written by putin to offend his US Status even more



Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 10:16 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote:
> PS for everybody:  -  Hi!  I am accepting anyone's help to catch the Piggie
> and make a good feijoada, with bacon and torresmo.  And caipirinha to
> celebrate!  :D
> 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caipirinha
> 
> Brazilian food and drinks are very Off Topic, but when we cook a Cypher
> Piggie, it becomes a cypherpunk topic, my dear Mirimir!  :D

Ignoring trolls is the best policy.

> sea sea
> --
> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
> say it."
> 


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 10:13 PM, juan wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:58:16 -0600
> Mirimir  wrote:
> 
>> On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
 todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it. Â  Â
 Â  Â  Â 
>>>
>>> juan has no right abuse others
>>
>> He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking
>> bot ;)
>>
> 
>   I only 'abuse' people who advocate mass abuse. If I sound like
>   a broken record it's because there are other broken records
>   constantly promoting things like 'regulation', 'governments'
>   'fake anonimty networks', making excuses for the pentagon and
>   big businesses, etc, etc, etc.

You do raise many valid points. But the problem for me is that it's
impossible to substantively discuss anything with you. Because, with few
exceptions, you seem just so certain that you're right. Given my
background as a scientist and esthole, I have little patience for that
attitude. It's pointless, and I have more interesting things to do.

>   Oh and there even are lunatics like cyber-swine here...

At least they keep it short, and sometimes even funny ;)



Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Cecilia Tanaka
PS for everybody:  -  Hi!  I am accepting anyone's help to catch the Piggie
and make a good feijoada, with bacon and torresmo.  And caipirinha to
celebrate!  :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caipirinha

Brazilian food and drinks are very Off Topic, but when we cook a Cypher
Piggie, it becomes a cypherpunk topic, my dear Mirimir!  :D

sea sea
--
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it."


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread juan
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 20:58:16 -0600
Mirimir  wrote:

> On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
> >> todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it. Â  Â
> >> Â  Â  Â 
> > 
> > juan has no right abuse others
> 
> He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking
> bot ;)
> 

I only 'abuse' people who advocate mass abuse. If I sound like
a broken record it's because there are other broken records
constantly promoting things like 'regulation', 'governments'
'fake anonimty networks', making excuses for the pentagon and
big businesses, etc, etc, etc.

Oh and there even are lunatics like cyber-swine here...










Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 09:27 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:20:25PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 09/08/2016 09:12 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>> And here's another such abuse:
>>
>> Which also has no conceivable relationship to cypherpunk :)
> 
> Government abuse of statutory power to suppress free speech, you claim
> not relevant to cypherpunk?
> 
> Whatever..

It's not, unless crypto played a key role in implementing it, or unless
you point out how crypto plays a key role in fighting it. Otherwise it's
off-topic. A little off-topic is fine, but well over 90% of your posts
are off-topic.


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Cecilia Tanaka
On Sep 9, 2016 12:02 AM, "Mirimir"  wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
> >
> > juan has no right abuse others
>
> He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking bot ;)

Mirimir, my dearest love, do you know what is a "feijoada"?  :)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feijoada

Please, don't waste time talking with the bacon and help me to make a good
feijoada.  A friend is helping, but he is pretty busy at work now.

I regret deeply all the time that I've spent crying for my ex-boyfriend
instead studying hardly to learn how to catch pigs.  Cooking pork isn't
vegan, but it will be very fun this time!  Oink Oink!  <3

Ah, I learned that "torresmo" exists in other countries!  "Pork rind",
haha!!  :D

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torresmo


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:20:25PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 09:12 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > And here's another such abuse:
> 
> Which also has no conceivable relationship to cypherpunk :)

Government abuse of statutory power to suppress free speech, you claim
not relevant to cypherpunk?

Whatever..


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 09:12 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:16PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
 todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it. Â  Â  Â  Â  Â 
>>>
>>> juan has no right abuse others
>>
>> He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking bot ;)
> 
> 
> This is the cotton wool generation, where "I have the right to a
> pristine auditory/ visual environment, where my ears and eyes cannot be
> assaulted by words which offend me", and if the word you use does offend
> me, I have a right to bring criminal charges against you.

The "cotton wool generation"? I just tell trolls to fuck off :)

> Safe spaces, anti-vilification, right to be not offended, right to stop
> others from speaking their mind.
> 
> Abuses of the lanugage used to abuse perceived abusers of language.

Whatever, Zenaan. I also have the right to ignore and slander him ;)

> And here's another such abuse:

Which also has no conceivable relationship to cypherpunk :)

>> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
>> OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOUR OR NATIONAL
>> OR ETHNIC ORIGIN
> 
> Note the word "behaviour", when the section then defines behaviour as:
> "causes words, sounds, images or writing to be communicated to the
> public"
> 
> which is actually speech, not behaviour. The usual abuse of language by
> those who wish to impose their views on the rest of the world.
> 


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:16PM -0600, Mirimir wrote:
> On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
> >> todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it. Â  Â  Â  Â  Â 
> > 
> > juan has no right abuse others
> 
> He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking bot ;)


This is the cotton wool generation, where "I have the right to a
pristine auditory/ visual environment, where my ears and eyes cannot be
assaulted by words which offend me", and if the word you use does offend
me, I have a right to bring criminal charges against you.

Safe spaces, anti-vilification, right to be not offended, right to stop
others from speaking their mind.

Abuses of the lanugage used to abuse perceived abusers of language.


And here's another such abuse:

> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
> OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOUR BECAUSE OF RACE, COLOUR OR NATIONAL
> OR ETHNIC ORIGIN

Note the word "behaviour", when the section then defines behaviour as:
"causes words, sounds, images or writing to be communicated to the
public"

which is actually speech, not behaviour. The usual abuse of language by
those who wish to impose their views on the rest of the world.


Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Mirimir
On 09/08/2016 08:50 PM, Cypher Piggie wrote:
>> todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it. Â  Â  Â  Â  Â 
> 
> juan has no right abuse others

He for sure does! But maybe not so repetitiously, like a fucking bot ;)



Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Cypher Piggie

> Oh, but he does like Putin... ;)

no, znane likes putin but to impress alexi wit posting putin shit all
day alexi should just go putin dacha and AP his ass no more putin posts
lololole teeh aha aha haaa hihi hihi




Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Cypher Piggie
> todefend to SOMEONE ELSE'S death his right to say it.          

juan has no right abuse others



Re: [WAR] Julian Assange - a one man Hillary Rodham Clinton wrecking ball

2016-09-08 Thread Cypher Piggie
> bringing the shit out in the open

you want to know in open what juan support in anonimouse forum...