Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Razer]

On 09/01/2017 12:48 AM, the scumbag wrote something totally irrelevant:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:22:20PM -0700, Razer wrote:
>> On 08/31/2017 06:49 PM, the scumbag wrote something totally irrelevant:
>>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:41:51 -0700 Razer  wrote:
> ...
>
> Finally had an insight into yourself?

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Razer]

On 09/01/2017 05:36 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
> On 2017-09-01 09:41, Razer wrote:
>
>> Your turn. What makes you think the alleged 'old' testament is of Judaic
>> origin, or is even correct regarding 'tales told about days of yore',
>> when compared to the Talmud and affiliated passed-down teachings?
>
>
> Old Testament based on...

Stopped there.

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[James A. Donald]

On 2017-09-01 09:41, Razer wrote:


Your turn. What makes you think the alleged 'old' testament is of Judaic
origin, or is even correct regarding 'tales told about days of yore',
when compared to the Talmud and affiliated passed-down teachings?



Old Testament based on the Septuagint, which we know from recorded 
history existed in its current form in 250BC, translated from Hebrew 
sources at the command of the Greek ruler of Egypt.


Jewish texts cannot be reliably dated to earlier than about 600AD.  For 
all we know some random bunch of people reinvented Judaism around six or 
seven hundred AD, except insofar as their texts have much in common with 
the Septuagint.

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:22:20PM -0700, Razer wrote:
> On 08/31/2017 06:49 PM, the scumbag wrote something totally irrelevant:
> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:41:51 -0700 Razer  wrote:
...

Finally had an insight into yourself?

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[juan]

On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 19:22:20 -0700
Razer  wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/31/2017 06:49 PM, the scumbag wrote something totally
> irrelevant:

Why is it irrelevant? Au contraire, it's the proper response
to your posturing as 'anti nazi' 'progressive'.

In reality, you as a joo, are piece of conservative, fascist
shit. So stop pretending.







> > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:41:51 -0700
> > Razer  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 08/31/2017 11:07 AM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>  And because I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT, I must mention the so-called
>  "Old Testament" is a CHRISTIAN biblical text.
> >>> What makes you think that?
> >>>
> >>> \0xd
> >> ROTF! I "Think that" because I spent three years at an after-school
> >> Hebrew class until my Bar Mitzvah, and went with my parents and
> >> grandparents to various orthodox, conservative,
> >
> > rayzer, it's kinda clear that you are a piece of fascist jew
> > shit- you don't need to drive the point any further...
> >
> > ...but since you keep throwing up...yes, fascism and judaism
> > are both far right wing, conservative, 'ideologies'. Every
> > time you rant against fascism and conservatism remember that jew 
> > 'culture' is the non plus ultra of lunatic,
> > totalitarian 'traditions'. 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> and reform synagogues
> >> at least once a month from the time I was 7 or so until I was 14...
> >> There are no "Old Testaments" at Synagogues.
> >>
> >> Your turn. What makes you think the alleged 'old' testament is of
> >> Judaic origin, or is even correct regarding 'tales told about days
> >> of yore', when compared to the Talmud and affiliated passed-down
> >> teachings?
> >>
> >> Rr
> 

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Razer]

On 08/31/2017 06:49 PM, the scumbag wrote something totally irrelevant:
> On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 18:41:51 -0700
> Razer  wrote:
>
>>
>> On 08/31/2017 11:07 AM, \0xDynamite wrote:
 And because I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT, I must mention the so-called
 "Old Testament" is a CHRISTIAN biblical text.
>>> What makes you think that?
>>>
>>> \0xd
>> ROTF! I "Think that" because I spent three years at an after-school
>> Hebrew class until my Bar Mitzvah, and went with my parents and
>> grandparents to various orthodox, conservative,
>
>   rayzer, it's kinda clear that you are a piece of fascist jew
>   shit- you don't need to drive the point any further...
>
>   ...but since you keep throwing up...yes, fascism and judaism
>   are both far right wing, conservative, 'ideologies'. Every time
>   you rant against fascism and conservatism remember that jew 
>   'culture' is the non plus ultra of lunatic,
>   totalitarian 'traditions'. 
>
>
>
>
>> and reform synagogues
>> at least once a month from the time I was 7 or so until I was 14...
>> There are no "Old Testaments" at Synagogues.
>>
>> Your turn. What makes you think the alleged 'old' testament is of
>> Judaic origin, or is even correct regarding 'tales told about days of
>> yore', when compared to the Talmud and affiliated passed-down
>> teachings?
>>
>> Rr

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Razer]

On 08/31/2017 11:07 AM, \0xDynamite wrote:
>> And because I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT, I must mention the so-called "Old
>> Testament" is a CHRISTIAN biblical text.
> What makes you think that?
>
> \0xd

ROTF! I "Think that" because I spent three years at an after-school
Hebrew class until my Bar Mitzvah, and went with my parents and
grandparents to various orthodox, conservative, and reform synagogues at
least once a month from the time I was 7 or so until I was 14... There
are no "Old Testaments" at Synagogues.

Your turn. What makes you think the alleged 'old' testament is of Judaic
origin, or is even correct regarding 'tales told about days of yore',
when compared to the Talmud and affiliated passed-down teachings?

Rr

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:55:00PM +, Ashkenazi wrote:
> > Razer g2s at riseup.net
> > Thu Aug 31 10:58:06 PDT 2017
> >
> > you can't show me any 'scripture'
> >
> 
> Talmud:
> archive.org/details/TheBabylonianTalmudcompleteSoncinoEnglishTranslation
> 
> TL;DR:
> 8ch.net/pol/res/10455342.html

WARNING: public posting of authoritative Jewish theological texts is
a death-punishable offence. Literally. Gotta watch the religionists,
occasionally they can get a little fanatical and ride that 
Razer's edge.


> Though Juan might prefer:
> 8ch.net/islam/
> 
> > I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT
> >
> 
> Because Rr is a fascist authoritarian who has decided for all of us what
> is known.
> 
> > "Old Testament" is christchan
> >
> 
> Lol.  The first five books are from the Jewish Torah.  I know you are
> not religious but fuck, you should know at least this.
> 
> 8ch.net/pol/res/10511347.html
> 
> > I'm not interested in arguing
> >
> 
> Only asserting your beliefs as truths.
> This is not our way.

You must be new 'round here?

;)

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Zenaan Harkness]

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 06:07:23PM +, \0xDynamite wrote:
> > And because I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT, I must mention the so-called "Old
> > Testament" is a CHRISTIAN biblical text.
> 
> What makes you think that?
> 
> \0xd

Because Christianity was the forefather to Judaism - this might be
called a "stretched fact", but it's still more equal that politically
incorrect actual facts - you been warned by the Razer logician yo!

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[\0xDynamite]

> And because I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT, I must mention the so-called "Old
> Testament" is a CHRISTIAN biblical text.

What makes you think that?

\0xd

Re: [from offlist] Re: Juan-fap go bye-bye now...

[Razer]

On 08/31/2017 10:32 AM, The Scumbag-Without-A-Life wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:40:46 -0700
> Razer  wrote:
>
>> Ps. Promoting the extermination of anyone based on an unalterable
>> trait is a little 'above the bar' that would generally be called
>> "controversial" in ANY society. T
>   yet extermination of all inferior races is your quintessential
>   jewish philosophy, isn't it?
>
>


I don't believe in "inferior races" and you can't show me any
'scripture' other than from the CHRISTIAN biblical texts that says so.
And because I KNOW YOU'RE IGNORANT, I must mention the so-called "Old
Testament" is a CHRISTIAN biblical text. But I'm not interested in
arguing relative merits, if any, of Nation-State-dependent "religions".

Bye.