On Friday, November 16, 2018, 12:15:13 PM PST, juan wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:25:18 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>> When I worked for Intel (1980-1982), a typical silicon linewidth was 3
>> microns. (3000 nanometers.) Recently I saw that Intel was using a 10
>> nanometer process,
Apple is a better company than than Microsoft. I ask you this: how does
Microsoft handle wiretap requests? How does Apple handle wiretap requests?
Does Microsoft sign any DLLs that is asked of them? It is curious that no
journalist talks about common procedure. No doubt this “attacker” is
defined
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:25:18 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
> When I worked for Intel (1980-1982), a typical silicon linewidth was 3
> microns. (3000 nanometers.) Recently I saw that Intel was using a 10
> nanometer process, 300x smaller in linear size, and (300x)**2 (90,000)
> smaller in
On Thursday, November 15, 2018, 12:49:56 PM PST, juan
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:15:29 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
me >> IIRC you also worked for intel designing memory chips? Excuse my
rather naive question but...Did you see/hear at that time any hints that chips
were
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:15:29 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
me >> IIRC you also worked for intel designing memory chips? Excuse my
rather naive question but...Did you see/hear at that time any hints that chips
were being tampered with or somehow backdooored because of 'national
security'?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 4:15 PM jim bell wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 11:52:43 AM PST, juan
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:00:52 + (UTC)
>
> jim bell wrote:
>
>
> >> My company, SemiDisk Systems, was very close to the first disk emulator
> for a number of types of
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 11:52:43 AM PST, juan
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:00:52 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
>> My company, SemiDisk Systems, was very close to the first disk emulator for
>> a number of types of PC, including the S-100, TRS-80 Model II, IBM PC, Epson
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 19:00:52 + (UTC)
jim bell wrote:
> My company, SemiDisk Systems, was very close to the first disk emulator for a
> number of types of PC, including the S-100, TRS-80 Model II, IBM PC, Epson
>
In "the good old days", in the 1970's, microprocessors were so much simpler.
My favorite one for awhile, the Z-80 was trivial by today's standards. No
multi-threading, no pipelining, no speculative instruction execution, etc. I
built my own homebrew personal computer, which I called the
Let my life be a lesson in futility. Go up against the government, and
they’ll send everything they got against you, including things that defy
known laws of physics.
Go with the government, get paid out of the NATO vulnerability slush fund
of tens of millions of dollars a year.
And sometimes a
Pretty embarrassing for “Intel Inside” if you ask me. Wonder how many
“whitehats” let their findings get suppressed for money.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, jim bell wrote:
> Sounds like a valid issue!
>
> Jim Bell
>
> On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 9:36:06 AM PST, Ryan
Sounds like a valid issue!
Jim Bell
On Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 9:36:06 AM PST, Ryan Carboni
wrote:
While many x86 implementation vulnerabilities in the past involve either
electromagnetic emissions or cache timing attacks, I have not read anything
about instruction
12 matches
Mail list logo
