Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-17 Thread Zenaan Harkness
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:39:00PM +, Braunstein Bears wrote: > > Ben Tasker ben at bentasker.cu.ck > > Thu Nov 9 08:18:28 PST 2017 > > > > Are you even permitted to post or read here, friend ? Will you not get > dragged into the dungeons and culturally enriched for wrongthink if you > get

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-11 Thread John Newman
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 9:31 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 06:09:45AM -0500, John Newman wrote: >> Anyway, I’m just speculating on the above. Maybe it also comes back >> to their purported “do no evil” bullshit - they wanted to get on the open >>

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-11 Thread Georgi Guninski
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 06:09:45AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > Anyway, I’m just speculating on the above. Maybe it also comes back > to their purported “do no evil” bullshit - they wanted to get on the open > source bandwagon. > Do you mean "do know evil"? The pronunciation is essentially the

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-11 Thread John Newman
> On Nov 11, 2017, at 5:16 AM, John Newman wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 09:38:45AM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:07:19AM -0500, John Newman wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:02:05AM -0500, John Newman wrote: It's funny looking

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-11 Thread John Newman
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 09:38:45AM +0200, Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:07:19AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:02:05AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > > It's funny looking back at the ancient flame war between Tannenbaum & > > > Torvalds... and

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-10 Thread Georgi Guninski
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:07:19AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:02:05AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > > It's funny looking back at the ancient flame war between Tannenbaum & > > Torvalds... and now it turns out there is a copy of Minix running at > > ring -3 in every

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread juan
On Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:36:44 -0500 John Newman wrote: > > > On November 9, 2017 1:16:02 PM EST, juan wrote: > >On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:19:45 -0500 > >John Newman wrote: > > > >> > > >> > also, the fact that motherfucking intel gets to

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread John Newman
On November 9, 2017 1:16:02 PM EST, juan wrote: >On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:19:45 -0500 >John Newman wrote: > >> > >> >also, the fact that motherfucking intel gets to 'save' >> > money by using free stuff isn't exactly good news either. >> > >> >last

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread juan
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 12:19:45 -0500 John Newman wrote: > > > > also, the fact that motherfucking intel gets to 'save' > > money by using free stuff isn't exactly good news either. > > > > last but not least, at some point it's quite ridiculous for > > open source

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread \0xDynamite
>> Tannenbaum's open letter to Intel is also a good read: > > not seeing much of value there - I would have expected a > principled and scathing attack on the biggest fascist chip > manufacturer on the plaenet and their 'management engine' but > there is onli one line in a

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread John Newman
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 01:23:47PM -0300, juan wrote: > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:07:19 -0500 > John Newman wrote: > > > > > > Tannenbaum's open letter to Intel is also a good read: > > not seeing much of value there - I would have expected a > principled and scathing

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread John Newman
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 04:18:28PM +, Ben Tasker wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, John Newman wrote: > > > It's funny looking back at the ancient flame war between Tannenbaum & > > Torvalds... and now it turns out there is a copy of Minix running at > > ring -3 in

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread juan
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:07:19 -0500 John Newman wrote: > > Tannenbaum's open letter to Intel is also a good read: not seeing much of value there - I would have expected a principled and scathing attack on the biggest fascist chip manufacturer on the

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread Ben Tasker
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:02 PM, John Newman wrote: > It's funny looking back at the ancient flame war between Tannenbaum & > Torvalds... and now it turns out there is a copy of Minix running at > ring -3 in every Intel CPU out there! Sweet fucking christmas. > > If I remember

Re: minix - tannenbaum won!

2017-11-09 Thread John Newman
On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 10:02:05AM -0500, John Newman wrote: > It's funny looking back at the ancient flame war between Tannenbaum & > Torvalds... and now it turns out there is a copy of Minix running at > ring -3 in every Intel CPU out there! Sweet fucking christmas. > > Slashdot coverage: > >