On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:36:35 +0200, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] said:
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:38:07PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
A lot of the patches (past and present) have been implemented. Some of
the
others will be implemented in time.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:29:59 +0100 (BST), David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Ken Murchison wrote:
Probably no good reason. I would gladly accept a patch to fix this, if
the undump code can be rewritten to accept either dump format.
I think that this is as simple
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:02:50AM +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 02:38:07PM -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
A lot of the patches (past and present) have been implemented. Some of the
others will be implemented in time. Others may not.
Some of them are
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Reading the sync_client protocol, I notice that do_mailbox_single
doesn't actually send the uidvalidity as part of the local mailbox
status from the server, so it can't even tell there's a difference.
[...], something to keep in mind next time there's a
