Re: Patch for 2.3.9 mod time bug

2007-10-03 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 09:51:09PM +0200, Michael Glad wrote: I also observe the 2.3.8/9 problem with sync_server not properly setting the mtime of sync'ed messages. The problem seems to be that the sync_message_fsync routine writes (flushes) to the message file after the utime call.

Re: Sieve not applied to mailbox when using imapsync

2007-10-03 Thread Ken Murchison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a sieve script that is doing what I want it to do when I email the account. I'd like to have this script run when moving mail from one mailbox into the account with the script, but it is not doing that when I use imapsync program. So.what do I need to do

Re: Sieve not applied to mailbox when using imapsync

2007-10-03 Thread Marc Rassbach
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ken Murchison wrote: Sieve scripts only get executed when mail is delivered via LMTP, not when APPENDed via IMAP. There is a specification for an IMAP-Sieve extension Ok. Thank you for the clarifying response. Because I'm trying to put together a bid for submission

[Fwd: problem with user canonicalization and pop3d]

2007-10-03 Thread Ken Murchison
Does anyone have any thoughts on this (the proxy piece isn't needed, since you can't proxy with USER/PASS)? Would it break any installations? It works in my testing. For sites using their own canonicalization plugin, this is probably necessary. -- Kenneth Murchison Systems Programmer

Re: Sieve not applied to mailbox when using imapsync

2007-10-03 Thread Ken Murchison
Marc Rassbach wrote: On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ken Murchison wrote: Sieve scripts only get executed when mail is delivered via LMTP, not when APPENDed via IMAP. There is a specification for an IMAP-Sieve extension Ok. Thank you for the clarifying response. Because I'm trying to put together

Making Replication Robust

2007-10-03 Thread Bron Gondwana
Hi, As I've mentioned on the mailing list, we have had to put quite a lot of infrastructure around Cyrus to make replication robust in all cases. While the core replication protocol seems pretty stable now, and with GUID stuff it will be easier to do integrity checks, it's still very much not a