http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~dpc22/cyrus/patches/2.3.14
autoconf.patch
==
Stop aclocal moaning about invalid header names. Was surprised
that Linux wasn't moaning about the same thing. SunFreeware provides
autoconf 2.63, which is more recent than the 2.59 shipped with SLES10.
Hello,
Le vendredi 27 mars 2009 à 03:09 +0100, Wesley Craig a écrit :
Could you enter this in Bugzilla as a feature request, please? Also,
a unified diff would be preferable.
Yes, it's done.
:wes
On 26 Mar 2009, at 06:38, Cyril Servant wrote:
Here is the patch for ipurge.c 2.3.14 :
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:07:29AM +, David Carter wrote:
ctype.patch
===
Mostly automatic using find and sed, but I did go back and remove
casts to (unsigned char) [correct but redundant], and (int) [typically
incorrect if the source is signed char, probably put there to stop
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Why did this touch sieve.h? It's generated by bison. Did you not
work on a clean tree?
2.3.14 ships with a sieve/sieve.h I did remove a number of the .c files
which are generated from Bison or Flex, but missed this one.
--
David Carter
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:07:29AM +, David Carter wrote:
robust_squatter.patch
=
Don't give up if index_me() throws an error. Not wildly happy about
mboxlist_findall which can run for several days in any case.
l-tail = l-tail-next = n;
Is that _guaranteed_ to
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 10:07:29AM +, David Carter wrote:
http://www-uxsup.csx.cam.ac.uk/~dpc22/cyrus/patches/2.3.14
Ok - I've loaded all 4 of these patches on top of my 'master' tree
on github and called the branch 'davidcarter', then rebased the
fastmaildev branch on top of it. That means
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:38:15AM +, David Carter wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Why did this touch sieve.h? It's generated by bison. Did you not
work on a clean tree?
2.3.14 ships with a sieve/sieve.h I did remove a number of the .c files
which are generated from
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Bron Gondwana wrote:
l-tail = l-tail-next = n;
Is that _guaranteed_ to evaluate correctly? It looks like someone
being a smartarse to avoid writing:
l-tail-next = n;
l-tail = l-tail-next;
It's a fairly common idiom for managing linked lists in C.
Or at least I thought
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:25:38PM +, David Carter wrote:
'=' has right to left associativity (KR second edition, page 53), so:
a = b = c
evaluates as:
a = (b = c)
But if you are happier with two or three lines of code, then go for it.
Yeah, I think it's clearer that it's two
On Tuesday, 24. March 2009 18:21:39 Wesley Craig wrote:
On 24 Mar 2009, at 06:47, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Thanks for calling. I don't like to spoil the party,
what about the issue which allows to create empty ACLs?
I seem to have forgotten to open a bug report,
what do you think is the
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:12:41PM +, David Carter wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Speaking of smartarse - you forgot to include util.h in sieve/test.c.
It's not part of the standard build, so easy not to notice - but our
install script builds it, so I noticed when I
11 matches
Mail list logo
