On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:25 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> On 2013-04-30 09:20, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> > Hi Bron,
> >
> > On Tuesday, 30. April 2013 08:53:24 Bron Gondwana wrote:
> >> Hi - have you looked at all at the special-use support in mainline
> >> Cyrus?
> >>
> >> Th
On 2013-05-19 21:45, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
wrote:
On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
> wrote:
>> Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 11:21 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
> > wrote:
> >> Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of the INBOX) to in
> >> fact be creat
Hi there,
I'm wondering whether it is me (us) doing something wrong, or whether
Cyrus IMAP git origin master HEAD is at fault...
C: A0019 SETMETADATA INBOX (/shared/vendor/kolab/folder-type mail
/private/vendor/kolab/folder-type mail.inbox)
S: A0019 BAD Missing metadata value
C: A0020 SETMET
On 2013-05-19 15:07, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
wrote:
Should you make the change to allow sub-folders (of the INBOX) to in
fact be created (while using altnamespace), would that eliminate the
use
of \NoInferiors?
Indeed it woul
On Sun, May 19, 2013, at 08:36 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> On 2013-05-02 07:29, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our
> > implementation of every standard that we claim to support.
> >
> > This is why I emailed the list last week
On 2013-05-02 07:29, Bron Gondwana wrote:
One of my release goals for Cyrus 2.5 is to be correct in our
implementation of every standard that we claim to support.
This is why I emailed the list last week asking if anyone is using the
intermediate SPECIALUSE representation in git. Since there wa
On 2013-05-18 16:34, Thomas Cataldo wrote:
As conflict marks were committed.
Thanks!
Committed and pushed.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
--
Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
m: +44 74 2516 3817
w: http://www.kolabsys.com
pgp: 9342 BF08
On 2013-04-26 16:17, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Is anybody actually using cyrus 2.5 git in production other than
FastMail?
Yes, though admittedly I should say "production".
I'm planning to do the mailboxes.db format changes before releasing
2.5, so that we don't have to support a stupid intermedi
On 2013-04-30 09:20, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
Hi Bron,
On Tuesday, 30. April 2013 08:53:24 Bron Gondwana wrote:
Hi - have you looked at all at the special-use support in mainline
Cyrus?
The xlist-* behaviour is planned to be removed, in favour of using
the RFC
6154 mandated annotation.
The im
10 matches
Mail list logo