On Wed, Apr 25, 2012, at 08:56 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> On 4/25/12 6:07 PM, Greg Banks wrote:
>
> > * Ditto warning flags - I would love to see at least -Wall -Wextra by
> > default if we're using gcc.
>
> 1) Please actually detect gcc properly if you're going to do this.
Fair enough.
> I'
On 4/25/12 6:07 PM, Greg Banks wrote:
* Ditto warning flags - I would love to see at least -Wall -Wextra by
default if we're using gcc.
1) Please actually detect gcc properly if you're going to do this. I'm
so tired of removing gcc-isms from Makefiles (and from C and especially
C++ code writ
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012, at 10:46 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> On Monday, April 23, 2012 03:05:24 PM Greg Banks wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Can SMakefile be deleted?
> >
> > I hope so. Most of what's in there is useless and the r
On Monday, April 23, 2012 03:05:24 PM Greg Banks wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Can SMakefile be deleted?
>
> I hope so. Most of what's in there is useless and the rest is wrong.
>
> It would be nice to have an autogen.sh which does all the
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012, at 12:15 PM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can SMakefile be deleted?
>
I hope so. Most of what's in there is useless and the rest is wrong.
It would be nice to have an autogen.sh which does all the necessary
autotools futzery, from aclocal to configure.
> Do we ne
On 2012-04-20 11:15, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
Hello,
Can SMakefile be deleted?
If it's not needed, it can.
Do we need "make snapshot" in addition to "make dist"?
It'd be nice to maintain a target doing pre-releases of current GIT, as
especially working towards 2.5 I plan on doing some of t
Hello,
Can SMakefile be deleted?
Remaining issues are:
* The cunit/ directory is proving resistant to automakification, but
successfully builds and runs unit tests.
I will rewrite cunit/Makefile.in to cunit/Makefile.am, for the purposes
of having "make dist" including the files from the
