Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-11-03 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2014-11-01 21:29, Bron Gondwana wrote: We already have one at FastMail to stop users setting an 'anyone' ACL. I think this may already be in upstream, unless you're talking about a different implementation/solution? http://git.cyrusimap.org/cyrus-imapd/tree/lib/imapoptions#n179 > Thi

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-11-01 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, at 01:45 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > On 2014-10-22 23:02, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > Yes, that means a massive change, instead of internally: > > > > example.com!user.foo.bar <=> user/foo/b...@example.com (which is a > > million ways of bogus) we would have

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-30 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2014-10-22 23:02, Bron Gondwana wrote: Yes, that means a massive change, instead of internally: example.com!user.foo.bar <=> user/foo/b...@example.com (which is a million ways of bogus) we would have: user.foo@example^com.bar <=> user/f...@example.com/bar Or in alt namspace: Other Users/f

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Bron Gondwana > wrote: >> Yeah, I'm afraid so. >> >> It's going to kind of suck for FastMail customers as much as anyone >> actually - since that's what we use! But here's the thing: >> >> a) it will be po

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-24 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > Yeah, I'm afraid so. > > It's going to kind of suck for FastMail customers as much as anyone > actually - since that's what we use! But here's the thing: > > a) it will be possible to switch to the netnews way if you want > b) but if you ha

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-23 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 09:18 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > If you DON'T have virtdomains, or the users are all in the default > domain, then it will keep working just the same. I guess we could have > a config option "strip domain if same" or something, and get the same > display as what we have no

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-23 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 09:03 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Bron Gondwana > wrote: >> __ >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana >>> wrote: >>> >>> We only set quotas on individual mailboxes

Re: POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-23 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014, at 08:55 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Bron Gondwana > wrote: > > We only set quotas on individual mailboxes so that wouldn't be a > problem. We also don't have sieve scripts except per-mailbox, so > ditto there. Sounds like you'll be fine. >

POLL: per-domain shared folder/sieve/etc

2014-10-22 Thread Bron Gondwana
So Cyrus has three different types of domain split: * none at all * "on/yes" => weird reverse DNS hackery * userid => login with domain. As part of finally switching to unixheirarchysep: on (yay) and better key format (double yay) I want to change the overarching "split users into separate doma