Hi Bron,
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 10:05:27 Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I'd like to put this into 2.4.7 - but I'm still confused by a few things!
>
> 1) ACL_MODE_ADD - it's now not being checked for any more, only
> ACL_MODE_SET and ACL_MODE_REMOVE. I guess the theory is that ADD can
> never remove
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:10:14 +0200
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Oh ok - that was only pushed to master, not to 2.4 stable. I will just add
> the new patch
> to -stable for 2.4.7.
Changed my mind again sorry - that code is complex and brittle and liable to
break if I
try to code this against it. Go
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:19:31 +0100
Guilherme Maciel Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found a bug in the cyrus-imapd-2.4.6-keep-owner-rights patch. That occur
> in
> the SETACL command, when trying to remove the admin rights. Thus, the
> following command should work, but does not:
> SETACL ma
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:19:31 +0100
Guilherme Maciel Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We found a bug in the cyrus-imapd-2.4.6-keep-owner-rights patch. That occur
> in
> the SETACL command, when trying to remove the admin rights. Thus, the
> following command should work, but does not:
> SETACL ma
Hi,
We found a bug in the cyrus-imapd-2.4.6-keep-owner-rights patch. That occur in
the SETACL command, when trying to remove the admin rights. Thus, the
following command should work, but does not:
SETACL mailbox mailboxowner -xi
And this one should not work, but actually works:
SETACL
Hi,
We found a bug in the cyrus-imapd-2.4.6-keep-owner-rights patch. That occur in
the SETACL command, when trying to remove the admin rights. Thus, the
following command should work, but does not:
SETACL mailbox mailboxowner -xi
And this one should not work, but actually works:
SETACL
Guilherme Maciel Ferreira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the patch against the master.
>
Applied and pushed, with full attribution, thanks!
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
--
Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com
t: +316 42 801 403
w: http://www.kolabsys.com
pgp: 9342 BF0
Hi,
here is the patch against the master.
Best regards,
On Friday 21 January 2011 03:14:57 Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote:
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > I like the idea - and it would be great if you did a patch again git
> > master at http://git.cyrusimap.org/ - follow the links. Or if
Hi Bron,
thanks for the reply.
On Thursday 20 January 2011 12:08:53 Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:45:18AM +0100, Guilherme Maciel Ferreira wrote:
> > So we changed the imap server to avoid such kind of behavior. The patch
> > was developed for version 2.3.16. It is possible to
Bron Gondwana wrote:
> I like the idea - and it would be great if you did a patch again git
> master at http://git.cyrusimap.org/ - follow the links. Or if you use
> git you can just fork it and ask us to pull your branch! That way you
> get full credit :)
>
Send us a patch via email and you ge
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:45:18AM +0100, Guilherme Maciel Ferreira wrote:
Gosh - sorry nobody responded to this!
> We were having problems with some users who deleted all ACL rights
> from a folder, rendering the mailbox inaccessible.
>
> There's already a feature in cyrus that the folder owne
Hi,
We were having problems with some users who deleted all ACL rights
from a folder, rendering the mailbox inaccessible.
There's already a feature in cyrus that the folder owner can't
delete his own administration rights (implicit acls).
This left one hole in the protection which is still cumb
12 matches
Mail list logo
