Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
They both have been tested under FreeBSD 9.0 with 2.3.18_1 port of FreeBSD. Best regards :) El Dom, 1 de Abril de 2012, 10:38 pm, ego...@ramattack.net escribió: > Good night, > > > Well people, have been working a little last hour... I think I got > something :) :) > > I think I have the patches

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
Good night, Well people, have been working a little last hour... I think I got something :) :) I think I have the patches ready :) :) Have modified the prot_printf function minimally for being able to work with pop3 UIDL for Outlook. The pop3d.c is the same... but the patch for /lib/prot.c is no

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
> > I guess the issue is that the original patch replaces prot_printf > implementation to rely on vsnprintf with a fixed-size (2048 bytes) buffer. > So if any part of cyrus has to write a string (%s) which size is over > 2048 characters (actually less than that, since there is the nul-byte > endi

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread Julien Coloos
Le 01/04/2012 14:45, Bron Gondwana a écrit : On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: I'm running an ISP environment with Cyrus 2.3.18. Given that Cyrus IMAP 2.3 is... well... rather old, it is maintained by only a small group of people having volunte

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2012-04-01 14:09, ego...@ramattack.net wrote: Good morning Jeroen, On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:08:36 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: On 2012-04-01 10:25, ego...@ramattack.net wrote: Good morning, Good morning, Not speaking to the code changes itself, I have a couple of sugg

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
%cyr_dbtool /expert/correo/imap/domain/e/egoitz.com/user/e/egoitz.seen skiplist show 04409b4d4f77894d1 1333236088 8127 1333236383 25,84,88,96:97,104,120,130,147,149,152,158:160,198,204,218,263,273,333,335,337,341,355,382:383,420,441,458,467,509,512,514,530,545,548,594,601,616,641,661,6

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:45:48 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: >I'm running an ISP environment with Cyrus 2.3.18. Given that Cyrus IMAP 2.3 is... well... rather old, it is maintained by only a small group of people hav

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
Good morning Jeroen, On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 11:08:36 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: On 2012-04-01 10:25, ego...@ramattack.net wrote: Good morning, Good morning, Not speaking to the code changes itself, I have a couple of suggestions / questions. If you are familiar with GIT

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread egoitz
Hi Bron, On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:45:48 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: >I'm running an ISP environment with Cyrus 2.3.18. Given that Cyrus IMAP 2.3 is... well... rather old, it is maintained by only a small group of

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 11:08:36AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: > >I'm running an ISP environment with Cyrus 2.3.18. > > Given that Cyrus IMAP 2.3 is... well... rather old, it is maintained > by only a small group of people having volunteered to do so. The > main focus for the

Re: Cyrus SEEN and uidl patch

2012-04-01 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2012-04-01 10:25, ego...@ramattack.net wrote: Good morning, Good morning, Not speaking to the code changes itself, I have a couple of suggestions / questions. If you are familiar with GIT, could you please clone the git repository[1] and create a patch(-set) with git-format-patch? In