Re: cyrus-imapd 3.0.0 next beta and release plan?

2015-12-30 Thread Ken Murchison via Cyrus-devel
The main motivation was that I/we wanted this completely contained within Cyrus rather than using an external service. A second, and minor, motivation was that I wanted to prove that I could do it. A lot of the code needed was already in place from the other services. On 12/29/2015 02:38

Re: cyrus-imapd 3.0.0 next beta and release plan?

2015-12-29 Thread Ken Murchison via Cyrus-devel
Thomas, If all that can be done safely in the signal handler is setting a global variable, I might just scrap the heartbeat functionality. The alternative is that the actual method processing code will have periodically check the status of the global variable. Or do you have a more creative

Re: cyrus-imapd 3.0.0 next beta and release plan?

2015-12-26 Thread Bron Gondwana via Cyrus-devel
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015, at 21:31, Ondřej Surý via Cyrus-devel wrote: > Hey folks, > > do you already have a release plan for cyrus-imapd 3.0.0? The next > Debian stable will freeze sometime next year, so I need to make a > decision whether I should make an effort to package 2.5.x, or just wait >

cyrus-imapd 3.0.0 next beta and release plan?

2015-12-22 Thread Ondřej Surý via Cyrus-devel
Hey folks, do you already have a release plan for cyrus-imapd 3.0.0? The next Debian stable will freeze sometime next year, so I need to make a decision whether I should make an effort to package 2.5.x, or just wait for 3.0.0 final (if you release it in the first half of 2016). Also next beta of