On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/8/30 Stefan Behnel :
>> Vitja Makarov, 30.08.2011 18:39:
>>>
>>> 2011/8/30 Stefan Behnel:
Robert Bradshaw, 30.08.2011 18:18:
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>
>> What about final clas
2011/8/30 Stefan Behnel :
> Vitja Makarov, 30.08.2011 18:39:
>>
>> 2011/8/30 Stefan Behnel:
>>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 30.08.2011 18:18:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>
> What about final classes with cpdef methods?
>
> @cython.final
> class Foo:
Vitja Makarov, 30.08.2011 18:39:
2011/8/30 Stefan Behnel:
Robert Bradshaw, 30.08.2011 18:18:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
What about final classes with cpdef methods?
@cython.final
class Foo:
cpdef bar(self):
pass
Should that raise an error?
That shou
Vitja Makarov, 30.08.2011 18:36:
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
What about final classes with cpdef methods?
@cython.final
class Foo:
cpdef bar(self):
pass
Should that raise an error?
That should be perfectly fine.
Robert meant
2011/8/30 Stefan Behnel :
> Robert Bradshaw, 30.08.2011 18:18:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>>
>>> What about final classes with cpdef methods?
>>>
>>> @cython.final
>>> class Foo:
>>> cpdef bar(self):
>>> pass
>>>
>>> Should that raise an error?
>>
>> That
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/8/
Robert Bradshaw, 30.08.2011 18:18:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
What about final classes with cpdef methods?
@cython.final
class Foo:
cpdef bar(self):
pass
Should that raise an error?
That should be perfectly fine.
Well, the 'final' decorator shouldn't
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov
wrote:
> 2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2011/8/27 Vitj
2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Vitja Makarov
> wrote:
>> 2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov
>>> wrote:
2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov :
> 2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2011/8/26 Vitja Makarov :
>>> 2011/8/25 V
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2011/8/30 Robert Bradshaw :
>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov
>> wrote:
>>> 2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov :
2011/8/27 Vitja Makarov :
> 2011/8/26 Vitja Makarov :
>> 2011/8/25 Vitja Makarov :
>>> 2011/8/25 Vitja M
gcc now has python bindings. Maybe that would allow the desired introspection?
That would be great, because it seems like python binding for gcc is going to
be
supported.
___
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/
Robert Bradshaw, 30.08.2011 07:32:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
I've created pull request:
https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/59
I've add support for inline methods, now you can declare inline method
in pxd file:
cdef class Foo:
cdef inline foo(self):
re
12 matches
Mail list logo