Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-31 Thread mark florisson
On 31 March 2012 17:15, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 31.03.2012 11:31: >> On 31 March 2012 10:14, Stefan Behnel wrote: >>> mark florisson, 30.03.2012 19:24: The release build looks good now, I'm thinking of pushing a second and final beta out there tomorrow. If anyone wants to

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 31.03.2012 11:31: > On 31 March 2012 10:14, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 30.03.2012 19:24: >>> The release build looks good now, I'm thinking of pushing a second and >>> final beta out there tomorrow. If anyone wants to get something in, >>> now is the time to raise voice

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-31 Thread mark florisson
On 31 March 2012 10:14, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 30.03.2012 19:24: >> The release build looks good now, I'm thinking of pushing a second and >> final beta out there tomorrow. If anyone wants to get something in, >> now is the time to raise voice. > > Note that Dag's NumPy specialisat

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-31 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 30.03.2012 19:24: > The release build looks good now, I'm thinking of pushing a second and > final beta out there tomorrow. If anyone wants to get something in, > now is the time to raise voice. Note that Dag's NumPy specialisation broke the Sage build by introducing a compiler cra

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-30 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/3/30 Robert Bradshaw : > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:24 AM, mark florisson > wrote: > >> The release build looks good now, I'm thinking of pushing a second and >> final beta out there tomorrow. If anyone wants to get something in, >> now is the time to raise voice. > > Excellent. I personally

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-30 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:24 AM, mark florisson wrote: > The release build looks good now, I'm thinking of pushing a second and > final beta out there tomorrow. If anyone wants to get something in, > now is the time to raise voice. Excellent. I personally don't know of anything that can't wait

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-30 Thread mark florisson
On 27 March 2012 12:58, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 27.03.2012 13:20: >> I tested the release in my own branch and jenkins was blue, but >> the release build seems to disagree. > > The release (and master) branch is tested against the "-ext" builds of > CPython, which have some external

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-27 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 27.03.2012 13:20: > I tested the release in my own branch and jenkins was blue, but > the release build seems to disagree. The release (and master) branch is tested against the "-ext" builds of CPython, which have some external packages installed, including NumPy. You have to chang

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-27 Thread mark florisson
On 27 March 2012 11:57, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/27 Sébastien Sablé Sablé : >> Great, thanks! >> >> >> 2012/2/25 mark florisson >>> >>> 2012/2/24 Sébastien Sablé Sablé : >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > could you please also look at incorporating the following patch before >>> > releasing 0.16? (if it

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-03-27 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/27 Sébastien Sablé Sablé : > Great, thanks! > > > 2012/2/25 mark florisson >> >> 2012/2/24 Sébastien Sablé Sablé : >> > Hi, >> > >> > could you please also look at incorporating the following patch before >> > releasing 0.16? (if it has not already been merged) >> > >> > https://github.com/

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-27 Thread Sébastien Sablé Sablé
Great, thanks! 2012/2/25 mark florisson > 2012/2/24 Sébastien Sablé Sablé : > > Hi, > > > > could you please also look at incorporating the following patch before > > releasing 0.16? (if it has not already been merged) > > > > https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/67 > > > > It has been more or

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-25 Thread mark florisson
2012/2/24 Sébastien Sablé Sablé : > Hi, > > could you please also look at incorporating the following patch before > releasing 0.16? (if it has not already been merged) > > https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/67 > > It has been more or less validated, but a test case is needed. > > This patch mak

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-24 Thread Sébastien Sablé Sablé
Hi, could you please also look at incorporating the following patch before releasing 0.16? (if it has not already been merged) https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/67 It has been more or less validated, but a test case is needed. This patch makes using C++ templates much more convenient with C

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread mark florisson
On 23 February 2012 15:43, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 23.02.2012 09:38: >> On 23 February 2012 08:36, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> 2012/2/23 mark florisson: On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: > We can also fix this ticket before release > http://trac.cython.org/cy

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 23.02.2012 09:38: > On 23 February 2012 08:36, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> 2012/2/23 mark florisson: >>> On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: We can also fix this ticket before release http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/761 >>> >>> Good idea. I think the tick

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/23 mark florisson : > On 23 February 2012 08:36, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> 2012/2/23 mark florisson : >>> On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: 2012/2/20 Vitja Makarov : > 2012/2/20 mark florisson : >> On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> 2012/2/15

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread mark florisson
On 23 February 2012 08:36, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/23 mark florisson : >> On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> 2012/2/20 Vitja Makarov : 2012/2/20 mark florisson : > On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> 2012/2/15 mark florisson : >>> On 15 Febr

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/23 Vitja Makarov : > 2012/2/23 mark florisson : >> On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> 2012/2/20 Vitja Makarov : 2012/2/20 mark florisson : > On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> 2012/2/15 mark florisson : >>> On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark f

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/23 mark florisson : > On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> 2012/2/20 Vitja Makarov : >>> 2012/2/20 mark florisson : On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/15 mark florisson : >> On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson >> wrote: >>> O

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread mark florisson
On 23 February 2012 08:30, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/20 Vitja Makarov : >> 2012/2/20 mark florisson : >>> On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: 2012/2/15 mark florisson : > On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson > wrote: >> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bra

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-23 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/20 Vitja Makarov : > 2012/2/20 mark florisson : >> On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> 2012/2/15 mark florisson : On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-19 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/20 mark florisson : > On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: >> 2012/2/15 mark florisson : >>> On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote: On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson > wrote: >>

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-19 Thread mark florisson
On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/15 mark florisson : >> On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote: >>> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Br

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-19 Thread mark florisson
On 19 February 2012 10:16, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/15 mark florisson : >> On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote: >>> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Br

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-19 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/15 mark florisson : > On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote: >> On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson >>> wrote: On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 A

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-15 Thread mark florisson
On 15 February 2012 15:45, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson >> wrote: >>> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson wrote: >

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-15 Thread mark florisson
On 14 February 2012 21:33, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson > wrote: >> On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson >>> wrote: On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw wrote:

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:09 PM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson >> wrote: >>> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread mark florisson
On 14 February 2012 17:19, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson > wrote: >> On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov >>> wrote: 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : > 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw :

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 7:49 AM, mark florisson wrote: > On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov >> wrote: >>> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : > All of Sage passes except for one test: > > sag

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-14 Thread mark florisson
On 14 February 2012 07:07, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov > wrote: >> 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : >>> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : All of Sage passes except for one test: sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py *

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-13 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : >> 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : >>> All of Sage passes except for one test: >>> >>> sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py >>> ** >>> File >>

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-12 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/12 Vitja Makarov : > 2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : >> All of Sage passes except for one test: >> >> sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py >> ** >> File >> "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/mi

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-11 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/2/11 Robert Bradshaw : > All of Sage passes except for one test: > > sage -t  devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py > ** > File > "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", > line 970: >

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-11 Thread Robert Bradshaw
All of Sage passes except for one test: sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py ** File "/levi/scratch/robertwb/hudson/sage-4.8/devel/sage-main/sage/misc/sageinspect.py", line 970: sage: sage_getargspec(bernstein_polynom

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-05 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/1/31 Robert Bradshaw : >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Vitja Makarov >> wrote: >>> 2012/1/26 Jason Grout : On 1/25/12 11:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > install > > https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudso

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-04 Thread Stefan Behnel
Vitja Makarov, 04.02.2012 19:49: >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> So I found one of the problems. Here is minimal cython example: >>> >>> def foo(values): >>>return (0,)*len(values) >>> foo([1,2,3]) >>> >>> len(values) somehow is passed as an integer to PyObject_Mult

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-02-04 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/1/31 Robert Bradshaw : > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Vitja Makarov > wrote: >> 2012/1/26 Jason Grout : >>> On 1/25/12 11:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: install https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/ext-libs/job/sage-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/cytho

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-30 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: > 2012/1/26 Jason Grout : >> On 1/25/12 11:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> >>> install >>> >>> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/ext-libs/job/sage-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/cython-devel.spkg >>> by downloading it and

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-28 Thread Vitja Makarov
2012/1/26 Jason Grout : > On 1/25/12 11:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> install >> >> https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/ext-libs/job/sage-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/cython-devel.spkg >> by downloading it and running "sage -i cython-devel.spkg" > > > > In fact, you could

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-25 Thread Jason Grout
On 1/25/12 11:39 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: install https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/view/ext-libs/job/sage-build/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/cython-devel.spkg by downloading it and running "sage -i cython-devel.spkg" In fact, you could just do sage -i https://sage.math.washingt

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-25 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:17 AM, mark florisson wrote: > On 25 January 2012 12:00, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> mark florisson, 25.01.2012 11:43: >>> On 25 January 2012 01:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson wrote: > It's been almost three months since w

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-25 Thread mark florisson
On 25 January 2012 12:00, Stefan Behnel wrote: > mark florisson, 25.01.2012 11:43: >> On 25 January 2012 01:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson wrote: It's been almost three months since we talked about a 0.16 release, I think it's quite ready.

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-25 Thread Stefan Behnel
mark florisson, 25.01.2012 11:43: > On 25 January 2012 01:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson wrote: >>> It's been almost three months since we talked about a 0.16 release, I >>> think it's quite ready. It would already be a big release, it would be >>> goo

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-25 Thread mark florisson
On 25 January 2012 01:27, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson > wrote: >> Hey, >> >> It's been almost three months since we talked about a 0.16 release, I >> think it's quite ready. It would already be a big release, it would be >> good to see how people like

Re: [Cython] 0.16 release

2012-01-24 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 2:27 AM, mark florisson wrote: > Hey, > > It's been almost three months since we talked about a 0.16 release, I > think it's quite ready. It would already be a big release, it would be > good to see how people like it, and to catch any issues etc before we > pile on more fe