On 10 May 2012 21:21, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> mark florisson, 10.05.2012 21:13:
>> On 9 May 2012 08:49, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
I think it's close enough to b
mark florisson, 10.05.2012 21:13:
> On 9 May 2012 08:49, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
>>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>>> I think it's close enough to be released.
>>
>> ... although one thing I just not
On 9 May 2012 08:49, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>> I think it's close enough to be released.
>
> ... although one thing I just noticed is that the "numpy_memoryview" test
Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 10:51:
> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>>
>> I think it's close enough to be released. I'll try to get around to list
>> the changes in the release notes (and maybe even ad
Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>
> I think it's close enough to be released. I'll try to get around to list
> the changes in the release notes (and maybe even add a note about alpha
> quality PyPy sup
On 9 May 2012 08:49, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
>> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
>> I think it's close enough to be released.
>
> ... although one thing I just noticed is that the "numpy_memoryview" test
On 9 May 2012 07:41, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>>> 2012/5/8 mark florisson:
On 8 May 2012 19:36, mark florisson wrote:
> Ok, so for the bugfix release 0.16.1 I propose that everyone cherry
> picks
Stefan Behnel, 09.05.2012 08:41:
> Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
>> If we're looking at doing 0.17 soon, lets just do that.
> I think it's close enough to be released.
... although one thing I just noticed is that the "numpy_memoryview" test
is still disabled because it lead to crashes in rec
Robert Bradshaw, 09.05.2012 00:16:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> 2012/5/8 mark florisson:
>>> On 8 May 2012 19:36, mark florisson wrote:
Ok, so for the bugfix release 0.16.1 I propose that everyone cherry
picks over its own fixes into the release branch (at le
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Vitja Makarov wrote:
> 2012/5/8 mark florisson :
>> On 8 May 2012 19:36, mark florisson wrote:
>>> Ok, so for the bugfix release 0.16.1 I propose that everyone cherry
>>> picks over its own fixes into the release branch (at least Stefan,
>>> since your fixes perta
2012/5/8 mark florisson :
> On 8 May 2012 19:36, mark florisson wrote:
>> Ok, so for the bugfix release 0.16.1 I propose that everyone cherry
>> picks over its own fixes into the release branch (at least Stefan,
>> since your fixes pertain to your newly merged branches and sometimes
>> to the mast
On 8 May 2012 19:36, mark florisson wrote:
> Ok, so for the bugfix release 0.16.1 I propose that everyone cherry
> picks over its own fixes into the release branch (at least Stefan,
> since your fixes pertain to your newly merged branches and sometimes
> to the master branch itself). This branch s
12 matches
Mail list logo
