Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-25 Thread Stefan Behnel
Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 25.08.2017 um 17:43: > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: >> I think we're ready for a release candidate >> then, or is there anything still open? > > Any updates on this? Sorry, was heavily occupied with fixing things up for the next major release.

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-25 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.08.2017 um 11:44: >> Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should >> start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch >> with recent fixes.

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-17 Thread Stefan Behnel
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.08.2017 um 11:44: > Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should > start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch > with recent fixes. It's currently the same as master, but I'd like to > separate the branches soon

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-09 Thread Stefan Behnel
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.08.2017 um 11:44: > Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should > start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch > with recent fixes. It's currently the same as master, but I'd like to > separate the branches soon

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-04 Thread Matthew Brett
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Am 3. August 2017 20:10:14 MESZ schrieb Matthew Brett: >>OK - I have set that up, wheels building on the "daily" branch here: >> >>https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/cython-wheels/branches > > Nice. > >>But, I'm a bit

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread Stefan Behnel
Am 3. August 2017 20:10:14 MESZ schrieb Matthew Brett: >OK - I have set that up, wheels building on the "daily" branch here: > >https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/cython-wheels/branches Nice. >But, I'm a bit worried by the pre-release naming scheme, because the >built wheel has name of form

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread James C. McPherson
On 4/08/17 04:10 am, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote: One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy, we could run CI with Cython

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, James C. McPherson wrote: > On 4/08/17 04:10 am, Matthew Brett wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Brett >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread Andreas Mueller
On 08/03/2017 12:46 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Ian Henriksen schrieb am 03.08.2017 um 18:16: On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:05 AM Matthew Brett wrote: On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote: One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy, we could run CI with Cython

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread Stefan Behnel
Ian Henriksen schrieb am 03.08.2017 um 18:16: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:05 AM Matthew Brett wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote: >>> One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy, >>> we could run CI with Cython master. That might lead to finding issues

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote: > One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy, > we could run CI with Cython master. That might lead to finding issues > earlier. > We probably don't want to build cython from source on CI, as I expect

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-03 Thread Andy
One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy, we could run CI with Cython master. That might lead to finding issues earlier. We probably don't want to build cython from source on CI, as I expect that would take too much time. On 08/02/2017 05:44 AM, Stefan Behnel

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-02 Thread Robert Bradshaw
+1, I've been thinking the same. I'll have time to look into these issues next week (if I don't manage to get to them sooner). On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Hi! > > Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should > start

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-02 Thread Kevin Thornton
If you want to be pedantic, #1788 can be viewed as desirable. Thou shall not (publicly) inherit from namespace std's containers. On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:50 AM Stefan Behnel wrote: > Hi! > > Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should > start

Re: [Cython] Preparations for Cython 0.26.1 and 0.27

2017-08-02 Thread Andreas Mueller
FWIW it looks like scikit-learn master builds without problems using cython master. On 08/02/2017 05:44 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote: Hi! Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch with recent