Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 25.08.2017 um 17:43:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> I think we're ready for a release candidate
>> then, or is there anything still open?
>
> Any updates on this?
Sorry, was heavily occupied with fixing things up for the next major
release.
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.08.2017 um 11:44:
>> Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should
>> start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch
>> with recent fixes.
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.08.2017 um 11:44:
> Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should
> start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch
> with recent fixes. It's currently the same as master, but I'd like to
> separate the branches soon
Stefan Behnel schrieb am 02.08.2017 um 11:44:
> Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should
> start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch
> with recent fixes. It's currently the same as master, but I'd like to
> separate the branches soon
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Am 3. August 2017 20:10:14 MESZ schrieb Matthew Brett:
>>OK - I have set that up, wheels building on the "daily" branch here:
>>
>>https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/cython-wheels/branches
>
> Nice.
>
>>But, I'm a bit
Am 3. August 2017 20:10:14 MESZ schrieb Matthew Brett:
>OK - I have set that up, wheels building on the "daily" branch here:
>
>https://travis-ci.org/MacPython/cython-wheels/branches
Nice.
>But, I'm a bit worried by the pre-release naming scheme, because the
>built wheel has name of form
On 4/08/17 04:10 am, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote:
One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy,
we could run CI with Cython
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:39 PM, James C. McPherson
wrote:
> On 4/08/17 04:10 am, Matthew Brett wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Brett
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy
On 08/03/2017 12:46 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Ian Henriksen schrieb am 03.08.2017 um 18:16:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:05 AM Matthew Brett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote:
One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy,
we could run CI with Cython
Ian Henriksen schrieb am 03.08.2017 um 18:16:
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:05 AM Matthew Brett wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote:
>>> One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy,
>>> we could run CI with Cython master. That might lead to finding issues
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Andy wrote:
> One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy,
> we could run CI with Cython master. That might lead to finding issues
> earlier.
> We probably don't want to build cython from source on CI, as I expect
One more thing: If there was a nightly wheel like for scipy and numpy,
we could run CI with Cython master. That might lead to finding issues
earlier.
We probably don't want to build cython from source on CI, as I expect
that would
take too much time.
On 08/02/2017 05:44 AM, Stefan Behnel
+1, I've been thinking the same. I'll have time to look into these
issues next week (if I don't manage to get to them sooner).
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:44 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should
> start
If you want to be pedantic, #1788 can be viewed as desirable. Thou shall
not (publicly) inherit from namespace std's containers.
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 2:50 AM Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should
> start
FWIW it looks like scikit-learn master builds without problems using
cython master.
On 08/02/2017 05:44 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Hi!
Given the current set of bugs and regressions in 0.26, I think we should
start preparing a 0.26.1 release. I've already updated the release branch
with recent
15 matches
Mail list logo