[Bug 148] gcc inline asm instruction template must be a constant char string regression

2018-09-01 Thread gdc-bugzilla--- via D.gnu
https://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 148] gcc inline asm instruction template must be a constant char string regression

2018-05-28 Thread gdc-bugzilla--- via D.gnu
https://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||291 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.g

[Bug 148] gcc inline asm instruction template must be a constant char string regression

2016-02-11 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 --- Comment #4 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #3) > For resolving any kind of symbol to string via CTFE, I'd suggest we defer > running semantic analysis until the second pass. > > See for instance: > https://github.c

[Bug 148] gcc inline asm instruction template must be a constant char string regression

2016-02-10 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw --- For resolving any kind of symbol to string via CTFE, I'd suggest we defer running semantic analysis until the second pass. See for instance: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/5302/files#diff-0

[Bug 148] gcc inline asm instruction template must be a constant char string regression

2015-04-11 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 --- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw --- The regression is now fixed: https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/c76a734d3bf6db8120d4262fd2bba53c58174e29 I'm not sure about the enhancement, it requires that some semantic analysis that the parse

[Bug 148] gcc inline asm instruction template must be a constant char string regression

2014-08-09 Thread via D.gnu
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148 art.08...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||art.08...@gmail.com --- Comment #1