On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 08:09:36 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 07:08:09 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
A helloworld program on the X86_64-pc-linux-gnu platform
contains 40 lines of assembly code or on the ARM
(aarch64-linux-gnu) platform only 34 lines of assembly code,
On Wednesday, 18 August 2021 at 07:08:09 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 20:39:29 UTC, max haughton wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 18:39:27 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 10:05:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[...]
Why does a simple or empty Hello program
On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 20:39:29 UTC, max haughton wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 18:39:27 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 10:05:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[...]
Why does a simple or empty Hello program generate a lot of
assembly output for the risc-v
On Tuesday, 17 August 2021 at 18:39:27 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 10:05:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
[...]
Why does a simple or empty Hello program generate a lot of
assembly output for the risc-v architecture, but not for the
ARM and X86 architectures?
Need an example.
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 10:05:08 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 09:28:41 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
[...]
There's nothing specifically tied to ARM in LWDR per-say.
Maybe that'll change once exception support gets added (ARM
EABI unwinder follows a different ABI), but I'm
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 09:28:41 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 08:43:40 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
The list of targets on that site is only what's present in
On Monday, 16 August 2021 at 08:43:40 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
The list of targets on that site is only what's present in
[contrib/config-list.mk](https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/91292490d573f9f9e4f162d6d8c693a969197f2d/contrib/config-list.mk#L32-L105), which is just a bunch of
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 19:42:11 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 17:22:28 UTC, max haughton wrote:
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 15:03:26 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
Hi Iain Buclaw, we appreciate your efforts in the d for the
gnu ecosystem.
but what is the status of gdc for risc-v
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 20:11:23 UTC, max haughton wrote:
By elf target you mean that it doesn't assume the existence of
Linux APIs? What's the difference? It will be outputting an elf
binary
I don't know, so far I have worked on each C target with
riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc,
So far I have
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 19:42:11 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 17:22:28 UTC, max haughton wrote:
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 15:03:26 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
Hi Iain Buclaw, we appreciate your efforts in the d for the
gnu ecosystem.
but what is the status of gdc for risc-v
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 17:22:28 UTC, max haughton wrote:
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 15:03:26 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
Hi Iain Buclaw, we appreciate your efforts in the d for the
gnu ecosystem.
but what is the status of gdc for risc-v architecture,
especially newlib?
explore.dgnu.org
Have a
On Sunday, 15 August 2021 at 15:03:26 UTC, Mahdi wrote:
Hi Iain Buclaw, we appreciate your efforts in the d for the gnu
ecosystem.
but what is the status of gdc for risc-v architecture,
especially newlib?
explore.dgnu.org
Have a play with that, RISC-V should work perfectly fine for low
12 matches
Mail list logo
