Re: Smoke failures on Solaris 2.8

2002-04-04 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Thu 04 Apr 2002 10:58, Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:40:31AM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:37:00PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:37:21PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: NFS likely. I don't

Re: Smoke failures on Solaris 2.8

2002-04-04 Thread Nick Ing-Simmons
Jarkko Hietaniemi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:37:00PM -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:37:21PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: NFS likely. I don't know what to do about this, detecting that we are on NFS is ENONPORTABLE. Touch a file and

Re: Smoke failures on Solaris 2.8

2002-04-03 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:37:21PM +0300, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: NFS likely. I don't know what to do about this, detecting that we are on NFS is ENONPORTABLE. Touch a file and see if it's mtime is significantly different than the current time? :) -- Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL