http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791646
Someone needs to write this paper, but for the Intelligence Community law... This is an extremely long way of saying "What we have now as legal doctrine doesn't work because the physics has changed underneath us." If you read this paper after reading a lot of the NATO Tallinn documents you will find yourself understanding why they have to always state first the relevance of their old legal frameworks to cyber - simply because they are wrong and they smell it, even if they can't admit it yet. :) -dave It's Too Complicated: The Technological Implications of IP-Based Communications on Content/Non-Content Distinctions and the Third Party Doctrine Steven M. Bellovin <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1319266> Columbia University - Department of Computer Science Matt Blaze <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1319278> University of Pennsylvania - School of Engineering & Applied Science Susan Landau <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1661299> Worcester Polytechnic Institute Stephanie K. Pell <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1662380> West Point--Army Cyber Institute; Stanford University - Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society June 7, 2016 /Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Forthcoming <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2791646##>/
_______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list Dailydave@lists.immunityinc.com https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave