wor...@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) writes:
> [How about salting the hashes?]
OK, this has been discussed...
Dale
___
dane mailing list
dane@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
Dale Worley in his review:
> 2. Presumably it was deliberate not to have the first label for an
> SNAMEA record be the canonical UTF-8 string for the local-part, even
> though the DNS architecture (RFC 1035) seems to admit binary labels.
> 3. Location of the SMIMEA Record
>
"Paul Hoffman" writes:
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 6:35, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> Thanks Dale for the detailed review and the discussion.
>>
>> I've had a read through the resulting thread and don't
>> see anything that wasn't discussed in the WG that needs
>> a major change