On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:52:45AM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 03:47:06 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --dont-allow-conflicts to darcs pull.
It also adds --allow-conflicts that is the default behavior of pull.
I only looked at this patch quickly, but it looks like it
Excerpts from Tommy Pettersson's message of Wed Jan 16 11:22:00 +0100 2008:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:52:45AM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 03:47:06 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --dont-allow-conflicts to darcs pull.
It also adds --allow-conflicts that is the
New submission from Michael Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Running
darcs get http://code.haskell.org/yi
produces one of the following responses (depending on version).
Running the darcs-1.0.9-i386-linux binary, as downloaded from darcs.net,
produces the message:
$ darcs get
Excerpts from bugs's message of Wed Jan 16 15:11:24 UTC 2008:
New submission from Michael Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[...]
By the way, the page http://www.darcs.net/manual/node3.html suggests
downloading the darcs repository from http://abridgegame.org/repos/darcs
-- this appears to be
Wed Jan 16 20:34:26 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --{allow,dont-allow,mark}-conflicts to darcs pull.
This patch also merge the --external option to pull_conflicts_options
like with apply.
New patches:
[Add --{allow,dont-allow,mark}-conflicts to darcs pull.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This
Excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of Wed Jan 16 11:23:52 +0100 2008:
Excerpts from Tommy Pettersson's message of Wed Jan 16 11:22:00 +0100 2008:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:52:45AM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 03:47:06 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add
Nicolas Pouillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of Wed Jan 16 11:23:52 +0100 2008:
Excerpts from Tommy Pettersson's message of Wed Jan 16 11:22:00 +0100 2008:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:52:45AM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 03:47:06 CET 2008
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:36:30PM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 20:34:26 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --{allow,dont-allow,mark}-conflicts to darcs pull.
This patch also merge the --external option to pull_conflicts_options
like with apply.
Hmmm... I don't think
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:18:15PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:36:30PM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 20:34:26 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --{allow,dont-allow,mark}-conflicts to darcs pull.
This patch also merge the --external option
In short, it probably isn't worth it, unless the new repository
formats (which I haven't looked at) tend to bundle more patches
together into one file for the compression tool to find redundancy in:
Current:
37188 trunk-get/_darcs
Each patch un-gzipped and 7zipped:
32684
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:40:15PM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 09:18:15PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:36:30PM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 20:34:26 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add --{allow,dont-allow,mark}-conflicts to
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 11:11:40AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Anyhow, could you retry this test with the above change in methodology,
and let me know if (a) the pull is still slow the first time and (b) if
it's much faster the second time (after the reverse unpull/pull)?
I think I've done
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:12:11PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 03:50:36PM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 07:36:30PM +, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
Wed Jan 16 20:34:26 CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Add
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 10:12:11PM +0100, Tommy Pettersson wrote:
Unfortunately one problem with using the same option is that the
[DEFAULT] information is currently hard-coded in the option's
description, i.e., Pull and Apply can't have the same option
with different descriptions of which is
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:13:56AM +0100, Petr Rockai wrote:
Hi!
Hi Petr,
I've looked over your email (and enjoyed it--but not by laughing), and
found a few places where I think there are problems.
(cutting bits I'm not commenting on)
The step, where user selects taken and cancelled branches
zooko writes:
In short, it probably isn't worth it, unless the new repository
formats (which I haven't looked at) tend to bundle more patches
together into one file for the compression tool to find redundancy in:
Better to use zip format than tar, as zip has an index (that's why
it's
New submission from Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just testing.
--
messages: 2541
nosy: beschmi, droundy, kowey, markstos, tommy
priority: urgent
status: unread
title: Testing new PostgreSQL backend for the bug tracker. Please Ignore
__
Darcs bug
On Jan 16, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Better to use zip format than tar, as zip has an index (that's why
it's used by jar files and Python eggs, IIRC). Doesn't 7zip have a
full archive mode like zip?
Yes, it does. It didn't occur to me to use it for these
measurements,
Hi,
I have brief question about DARCS correctness. I must admit to
being more familiar with Operational Transformation theory better
than Darcs theory of patches, but I believe the two are very
similar. There is a brief intro to OT theory here: http://
zooko writes:
On Jan 16, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Better to use zip format than tar, as zip has an index (that's why
it's used by jar files and Python eggs, IIRC). Doesn't 7zip have a
full archive mode like zip?
Yes, it does. It didn't occur to me to use
20 matches
Mail list logo
