David Roundy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
>> Incedentally, I'm doing a get on this repository right now, and darcs2 has
>> been silent (no progress info at all) for a couple of minutes, even though
>> I can see it downloading stuff... oh, now it says "Ide
David Roundy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:03:52AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:53:57AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
>>> You should be able to reproduce this pretty easily with a darcs2 ghc
>>> repository. I get no progress messages at all from pull for quite a whi
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> Incedentally, I'm doing a get on this repository right now, and darcs2 has
> been silent (no progress info at all) for a couple of minutes, even though
> I can see it downloading stuff... oh, now it says "Identifying repository".
Th
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:03:52AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:53:57AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> > You should be able to reproduce this pretty easily with a darcs2 ghc
> > repository. I get no progress messages at all from pull for quite a while,
> > and the 400-pa
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:53:57AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> David Roundy wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> >> I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if
> >> I
> >> could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit reg
David Roundy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
>> I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
>> could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
>> performance of unpull:
>
> I'll try to take a look at th
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
> could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
> performance of unpull:
I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow... I've spent my
On 07/02/2008, Simon Marlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
> could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
> performance of unpull:
>
> $ darcs2 unpull --from-tag=2007-09-25 -a
> 134.18s real 128.56
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
performance of unpull:
$ darcs2 unpull --from-tag=2007-09-25 -a
134.18s real 128.56s user 2.32s system 97% darcs2
previously this was ~15 seco