On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 07:48:15PM -0700, Bill Trost wrote:
David Roundy wrote:
We've talked about this recently, and I think the consensus was that
we wouldn't mind for binary patches to be binary
My only concern is the email encoding. darcs send currently just spits
the
The test really states what this is about. Inspired by bug report #504
(which I suspect refers to an already-fixed bug), I wrote a test script
that darcs fails involving adding and removing a binary file. I then have
two patches that fix the bug. One works by avoiding generating the null
binary
David Roundy wrote:
No, darcs always uses the standard scp command-line interface. I'm not
really the one to ask, but I seem to recall being told that the problem has
to do with cygwin apps (e.g. cygwin scp) not accepting windows paths, which
darcs passes to scp.
I just tested one simple
