Greetings,
David suggested that I ask here about getting a patch for the bug
mentioned here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.darcs.user/9239
Some users feel this bug is pretty serious and I'd be happy to upload
a patched version to Debian (against the 1.0.3 version). Can
New submission from Zooko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Two problems:
1. Many users think that they need to use darcs remove to remove a file,
much as one is required to use svn delete/rm/remove in Subversion. For
example, see this thread:
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Interesting. Do you have any test cases? Or could this tool be used in
any
test cases to help stress darcs?
No, but I use deps.pl personally to generate pretty graphs of my patch
dependencies.
I'm wondering if we should have a darcs-contrib repository.
I meant to add a comment to this send, but I had to run off
to work.
These patches don't need to be applied to unstable right away.
There's nothing wrong with them, they fix a bug with unpull
by removing an optimization, but it can possibly be solved
in a better way keeping the optimization.
--
New submission from Tommy Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Aaron Kaplan
There seems to be a bug in the way darcs inverts certain patches.
Consider a file that begins as
---8-
one
two
three
---8-
and then is modified to look like
---8-
three
one
---8-
If
I believe it is time to get a new stable release ready soon.
I want issue67 and issue128 to be solved since they can cause
corrupted repos. I also think issue48 should be addressed in
some way, since it can have rather nasty effects and is not hard
to exploit.
issue67: Getting a tag giving
