David Roundy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
performance of unpull:
I'll try to take a look at this
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:03:52AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:53:57AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
You should be able to reproduce this pretty easily with a darcs2 ghc
repository. I get no progress messages at all from pull for quite a while,
and the 400-patch
David Roundy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:03:52AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:53:57AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
You should be able to reproduce this pretty easily with a darcs2 ghc
repository. I get no progress messages at all from pull for quite a while,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
Incedentally, I'm doing a get on this repository right now, and darcs2 has
been silent (no progress info at all) for a couple of minutes, even though
I can see it downloading stuff... oh, now it says Identifying repository.
This
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:53:57AM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
David Roundy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if
I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in
On 07/02/2008, Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
performance of unpull:
$ darcs2 unpull --from-tag=2007-09-25 -a
134.18s real 128.56s user
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:26:09PM +, Simon Marlow wrote:
I just updated my darcs2 to try out the new ByteString changes and see if I
could reproduce Erik's results, and I'm seeing a bit regression in the
performance of unpull:
I'll try to take a look at this tomorrow... I've spent my
