Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Set up configure to build an rpm spec fi... (and 1 more)

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:46:09AM +0100, Michael De La Rue wrote: > These patches add a spec file (kept up to date by configure) to the darcs > repository. This will make it easy to build rpm packages just by running > > rpmbuild -ta > > spec file is based on the one from Fedora Core 8.

Re: [darcs-users] the darcs send experience

Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If darcs could have a good mailer default... here I see by default > "darcs failed: no mail facility (sendmail or mapi) located at > configure time!" First: Why, oh why does darcs depend on that at > *configure* time? It's quite a nuisance for distro pac

[darcs-users] Bug#486192: RFH: darcs -- an advanced revision control system

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request assistance with maintaining the darcs-server package. Specifically, I need one or two volunteers to help me by testing prospective packages (prior to uploading to Debian) to make sure that darcs-server works correctly. Since I don't use darcs-server perso

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Use changes -s style for unlogged patche... (and 1 more)

Applied. Thanks! David On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that's the ChangeLog for 2.0.1 done. > [phew! glad that's over with, one of my more bizarre addictions] > > Please make any changes you see fit. > > Sat Jun 14 08:26:32 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMA

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: hscurl.c: fix harmless warning with curl >= 7.18.1.

Applied. Thanks! David On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fri Jun 13 16:56:07 MSD 2008 Dmitry Kurochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * hscurl.c: fix harmless warning with curl >= 7.18.1. > ___ darcs-users mailing

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

>> Could http://bugs.darcs.net/issue920 be related? > > I'm not sure. Is it possible to get a stack trace of the running Haskell > process on Windows? If so, please get one and let compare it with my > pstack output on Solaris. I don't know. Windows help needed! [especially if you are willing to

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

Eric Kow wrote: >> this is again test_network running forever. In this case for 2 days on >> Darwin. So we have seen it so far on Darwin, Linux, Solaris and OpenBSD >> buildbots. My personal bet is that this is issue876. > > Could http://bugs.darcs.net/issue920 be related? I'm not sure. Is it pos

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

> this is again test_network running forever. In this case for 2 days on > Darwin. So we have seen it so far on Darwin, Linux, Solaris and OpenBSD > buildbots. My personal bet is that this is issue876. Could http://bugs.darcs.net/issue920 be related? -- Eric Kow

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

Jules Colding wrote: > On 16/06/2008, at 12.01, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> this is again test_network running forever. In this case for 2 days on >> Darwin. So we have seen it so far on Darwin, Linux, Solaris and >> OpenBSD >> buildbots. My personal bet is that this is issue876. > >

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

On 16/06/2008, at 12.01, Karel Gardas wrote: > > Hello, > > this is again test_network running forever. In this case for 2 days on > Darwin. So we have seen it so far on Darwin, Linux, Solaris and > OpenBSD > buildbots. My personal bet is that this is issue876. Build 17 has just completed succ

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

Hello, this is again test_network running forever. In this case for 2 days on Darwin. So we have seen it so far on Darwin, Linux, Solaris and OpenBSD buildbots. My personal bet is that this is issue876. Cheers, Karel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a new failure of jules ap

Re: [darcs-users] Migrating a related set of branches to darcs-2 format

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:58:52PM +0200, Andreas wrote: > Things become more complicated if the branches do not contain all the patches > from the base. In that case you probably need to find the common base of the > 2 branches and then pull the additional changes of both trees into the > conve