Re: [darcs-users] how to build a darcs executable that reports its version number correctly

On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 14:17:08 -0700, zooko wrote: > So, if I talk to other people and they ask me how to build darcs, > should I advise them to run "./configure && make && ./configure && > make" in order that they will get a good version number? maybe a make maintainer-clean is helpful if i

Re: [darcs-users] how to build a darcs executable that reports its version number correctly

On Jun 30, 2008, at 2:12 PM, zooko wrote: > Here is one that I just built. It has the "2.0.2" tag, and it has > one extra patch beyond that, a patch named "fix makefile to remember > to regenerate version information after running configure.". > > So, I would expect it to have a version number li

[darcs-users] how to build a darcs executable that reports its version number correctly

Folks: I continue to have problems with this, even though a couple of people have kindly attempted to explain it to me. Why don't the darcs executables that I build report nice version numbers for themselves? Here is one that I just built. It has the "2.0.2" tag, and it has one extra patc

Re: [darcs-users] updating the patch name?

> Is there any way to update the description text that accompanies a > patch other than unrecording and re-entering it? amend-record --edit -- Eric Kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 ___ darcs-users mailing list dar

[darcs-users] updating the patch name?

Is there any way to update the description text that accompanies a patch other than unrecording and re-entering it? thanks, -lev ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users