Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Avoid silly manpage error.

Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thu Jul 3 11:07:33 EST 2008 Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Avoid silly manpage error. > man (nroff) treats an apostrophe in the first column specially, > resulting in a syntax error without this patch. > > Ideally, all cases of 'foo' in t

[darcs-users] darcs patch: Avoid silly manpage error.

Thu Jul 3 11:07:33 EST 2008 Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Avoid silly manpage error. man (nroff) treats an apostrophe in the first column specially, resulting in a syntax error without this patch. Ideally, all cases of 'foo' in the manpage (i.e. docstrings) should become `foo',

Re: [darcs-users] how to build a darcs executable that reports its version number correctly

On Jul 2, 2008, at 7:03 AM, David Roundy wrote: > Just a script to reproduce the bug would be sufficient, > and could be extended to be a unit test. Okay, there follows the script that I currently use to build darcs (which I do rather often, since I always want the latest and greatest darcs o

[darcs-users] Darcs 2.0.2 Generic Linux build

Hi, at briksoftware (a 2 person company) we are using darcs to revision control all of our projects. As our server is running CentOS 4.6 I've compiled a binary which is available at http://briksoftware.com/darcs-2.0.2-linux-i386.tar.gz . The binary is not statically linked but it should be eas

Re: [darcs-users] [issue938] darcs rebase

Thanks, Petr. You could perhaps send a patch to at least spark some discussion [I would point this out in the patch bundle description] I think if we were to create something as powerful as this, we should aim for some generality (to avoid proliferation of commands) and have some discussion on ho

Re: [darcs-users] [issue938] darcs rebase

Hi, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Things I would use a hypothetical darcs rebase for. This would clearly be an > unsafe command in the sense of darcs-amend, but I think we can come up with > enough scenarios to demonstrate that such a command would be useful in > practice > (and used of

Re: [darcs-users] how to build a darcs executable that reports its version number correctly

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:26 PM, zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I'm sorry that my bug report was complainy. That's all right. > I am somewhat interested in working on this aspect of the build system, > actually. It is comparable to the "darcsver" tool that I use for various > projects [