Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add a test for binary patch files.

Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tis test passes and seems to make sense, so I have fast-tracked it > into stable. > > But do please have a look at tests/README.test_maintainers.txt for tips > on improving tests. > >> +#!/bin/sh > > For some reason we have decided to switch to explicit uses

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add a test for binary patch files.

"Nicolas Pouillard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sun Sep 7 12:38:16 CEST 2008 Nicolas Pouillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Add a test for binary patch files. > > > New patches: > > [Add a test for binary patch files. > Nicolas Pouillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>**20080907103816] addfile > ./tests/bin

Re: [darcs-users] Help with darcs push

"Elliott Slaughter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm having a little trouble pushing to one of my remote darcs > repositories. The essential problem is that the version installed on > the server (1.0.9) isn't compatible with my version 2 repository, and > I can't upgrade the darcs installation si

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: make -q have an effect with darcs changes (show just p...

Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 19:17:40 -0400, David Roundy wrote: >> > Currently the --quiet flag has no effect on darcs changes. This is >> > inconsistent with the --help docs, and an opportunity; this patch makes it >> > show just the patch names, one per line. I

Re: [darcs-users] [issue1067] darcs 2.0.2 (+ 76 patches) fails where darcs 1.0.9(release) succeeds (windows, ghc repo, get)

> > I never liked that idea, I must say - if the hashes are useful, why > > not store them out of the way? Having a real pristine copy of the repo > > in place was a big point in favour of darcs1: (a) it is unlikely that > > it would screw up both copies at once, (b) it allows for easy > > scriptin

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: fix bug in file path handling. (and 2 more)

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here are some patches from David which appeared in unstable. I need a > volunteer to review them. Takers? I don't know enough about the path module to really comment on David's bug fixes, but a few things do stick out to me in

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] [issue992] short secure version identifiers

zooko wrote: > Hello Max Battcher -- I'm sorry that I didn't see this letter that you > wrote to me on darcs-users on 2008-08-12. Allow me to apologize in return for getting back to this slowly (crazy couple of weeks)... > On Aug 12, 2008, at 21:32 PM, Max Battcher wrote: > >> Just out of curi

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Move network related options to network_... (and 2 more)

On Sep 9, 2008, at 15:48 PM, Eric Kow wrote: >> Speaking of which, we really should get zooko (or can you do >> this?) to >> switch the buildbots over to darcs-unstable. Otherwise they can't >> give you much help, as you won't know until after you've applied a >> bad >> patch... > > I've pus

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Move network related options to network_... (and 2 more)

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:06:27 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > It's already applied and is being pushed, and I see no reason to > short-circuit the normal testing framework for this sort of thing. Oh, I think my definition of fast-track is actually pretty slow because I also run darcs check (prefer

Re: [darcs-users] darcs mirror (was: OpenBSD users here?)

Matthias Kilian wrote: > For my experimental mirror: please give it a try, it's at > http://darcs.volkswurst.de, and I'd like to see some people getting > and/or pulling from it (feel free to darcs get --complete, the > server should be able to handle it). But note that nofib is still > missing (be

[darcs-users] darcs patch: fix bug in file path handling. (and 2 more)

Here are some patches from David which appeared in unstable. I need a volunteer to review them. Takers? Tue Sep 9 16:53:25 BST 2008 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * fix bug in file path handling. Tue Sep 9 16:54:13 BST 2008 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * don't inline global variab

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Begin using RIO (and 39 more)

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:06 AM, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The problem here is that each replace patch we construct in the >> sequence basically comes from a different unrecorded state (since they >> are a sequence each new one comes from the final state of the previous >> one). W

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Begin using RIO (and 39 more)

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:06:29PM -0400, David Roundy wrote: > The problem here is that the type of sequenceRepls is wrong--I hadn't > looked carefully at that code previously. You're making it always > create patches that start at the unrecorded state, but that's not what > it's actually doing (

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Begin using RIO (and 39 more)

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:05:29PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > Due to the amount of work required to make a clean set of patches I > won't do that again until you're happy with the changes I have > locally. It's just too time consuming to keep doing it that way. > Sorry, but it literally takes me

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Begin using RIO (and 39 more)

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 05:08:20PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > David, > > > > This is an updated version of the patches I have. I still need > > feedback on them. I removed a bunch of unsafeCoercePs and fixed the > > compi

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Move network related options to network_... (and 2 more)

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:33:46PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > So previously, we said > >Eric only considers code comments, documentation and test suite >modifications to be obvious > > I think this sort of change is something I'm willing to consider obvious > and start fast-tracking as well.

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining...

Excerpts from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Tue Sep 09 13:03:36 +0200 2008: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 14:58:31 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > > - older than 7.18.0 - no pipelining > > - from 7.18.0 to 7.19.1 - pipelining support is enabled, but not used by > > default > > - from 7.19.1 - pipeli

Re: [darcs-users] [issue1067] darcs 2.0.2 (+ 76 patches) fails where darcs 1.0.9(release) succeeds (windows, ghc repo, get)

Hi Claus, I'm redirecting this discussion to the darcs-users mailing list where it belongs. :-) On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:46:30 +0100, Claus Reinke wrote: > You mean because it encrypts file names in pristine? More or less. > I never liked that idea, I must say - if the hashes are useful, why

[darcs-users] patch review script

Just a quick sed script for anybody who likes to do patch review over email. This automatically breaks a patch bundle into sections, with one section per patch. It also cuts away the context of a bundle. one patch - > the contents here > more contents your review

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Move network related options to network_... (and 2 more)

So previously, we said Eric only considers code comments, documentation and test suite modifications to be obvious I think this sort of change is something I'm willing to consider obvious and start fast-tracking as well. Objections? O

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining...

On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 14:58:31 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > - older than 7.18.0 - no pipelining > - from 7.18.0 to 7.19.1 - pipelining support is enabled, but not used by > default > - from 7.19.1 - pipelining support is enabled and used by default Thanks for explaining that! > I hope the

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining...

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:02:28 -0700, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: >> Mon Sep 8 21:57:26 MSD 2008 Dmitry Kurochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining by default for >> curl < 7.19.1.

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining...

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:02:28 -0700, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Mon Sep 8 21:57:26 MSD 2008 Dmitry Kurochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Add -[-no]-http-pipelining options, disable pipelining by default for > curl < 7.19.1. Hooray! This will help us release 2.0.3 sooner, thanks! I see you were

Re: [darcs-users] planning darcs 2.0.3

On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 19:27:48 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > The summary is that in the last 2 weeks, we've fixed about a dozen > bugs, most of which were regressions from 2.0.2 (mostly caused by > myself, to be honest). Usually you'd like to go at least a few weeks > without finding any new regr

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Apply Eric suggestions on tests/binary.sh

> Sun Sep 7 18:06:45 CEST 2008 Nicolas Pouillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Apply Eric suggestions on tests/binary.sh Pushed to stable, thanks! -- Eric Kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 pgpuoIy3GSupv.pgp Description: PGP signature