Re: [darcs-users] ANNOUNCE: darcs 2.5.2

-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] (lack of) darcs hosting

/... That might be true, but on the other hand what's wrong with http://www.patch-tag.com/ ? Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] darcs in 2010: talk/video online

___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Add script that tricks cabal into installing our build...

Thanks for doing this. I guess this will make buildbots owners live a lot easier. So we (owners) just need to make sure buildbot is run on account with cabal install installed. That's good... Karel Eric Kow wrote: On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 17:27:31 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: Just a little more

Re: [darcs-users] buildbot once again

Hi Petr, I know that you do a lot for darcs these days, but honestly speaking this email looks a little bit rude to me. First of all, for last month or so I also wondered why there are so many buildbots failing. Many just off-line and many on-line but failing on configure. Now I think I see the

Re: [darcs-users] buildbot once again

Petr Rockai wrote: Petr Rockai m...@mornfall.net writes: The openbsd one has however never been quite reliable -- I can't find a successful build in recent history. It seems that it is failing in tests with no output, and I cannot debug that. This is something that the you as the owner

Re: [darcs-users] David's darcs

will come formalised, unlike darcs-1 and darcs-2, which only come in form of (somewhat under-documented) code -- especially the darcs-2 case. Ah, OK, this sounds indeed very good. So I'm not afraid anymore. Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd

Re: [darcs-users] David's darcs

of darcs foundation? I hope not. Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo

[darcs-users] How to pass additional parameters on buildbot to cabal configuring darcs?

Hello, I do have libcurl installed on OpenBSD buildbot, yet cabal configure fails with: Setup: Missing dependencies on foreign libraries: * Missing C libraries: curl, curl This problem can usually be solved by installing the system packages that provide these libraries (you may need the -dev

Re: [darcs-users] How to pass additional parameters on buildbot to cabal configuring darcs?

, Karel Gardas wrote: it seems I'll need to invoke it with --extra-include-dirs=/usr/local/include --extra-lib-dirs=/usr/local/lib to pass curl information down the road. Do you have any idea how to do this directly on my buildbot? I think this requires a tweak to the build master configuration

[darcs-users] OpenBSD/Solaris buildbots running again

/stdio Thanks, Karel Tue Jun 23 06:37:30 CEST 2009 Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com * update description of Solaris and OpenBSD buildbots New patches: [update description of Solaris and OpenBSD buildbots Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com**20090623043730 Ignore

Re: [darcs-users] dropping GHC 6.6 support

Christian Kellermann wrote: * Matthias Kilian k...@outback.escape.de [090610 21:25]: On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:18:56PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: Slacker! You don't have to use the ghc package or port, you can just build a ghc-6.10 from the available ghc-6.6 and install it into some

Re: [darcs-users] please install hashed-storage on your darcs build slave

Eric Y. Kow wrote: Hi again, Darcs build slave managers with GHC 6.8 and below (or anybody who has not yet updated their slaves with hashed-storage): Petr has put hashed-storage 3.1 which should resolve the build problems. Please cabal update and cabal install hashed-storage And do

Re: [darcs-users] dropping GHC 6.6 support

working on OpenBSD, I'm ready to get buildbot working again of course... -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http

Re: [darcs-users] ghc for OpenBSD/sparc64

). Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] darcs vs sendmail

, Karel -- Karel Gardas kgar...@objectsecurity.com ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] retiring GHC 6.6 support after darcs 2.3 (2009-07)

Judah Jacobson wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Eric Kow ko...@darcs.net wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 21:22:41 +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote: Didn't you that by depending on haskeline? At least I couldn't build haskeline with ghc-6.6 on openbsd. Actually, the Haskeline dependency

Re: [darcs-users] where did 2.2.1 go?

Petr Rockai wrote: I would actually consider to drop autotools support for 2.2.2, since just making a hackage tarball and uploading to hackage is *so* much easier. Petr, thank your for your darcs work. It's really appreciated here, but have you already contacted various binary packages

[darcs-users] full get from partial repos fails on missing patch

Hello, I just got an impression today that darcs possibly do not handle the situation where I try to get (full get) the sources from the partial (got by get --partial) repository. I'm getting a message about missing patch from all darcs 1.0.9, darcs head from 2008/05/22 and just to be release

Re: [darcs-users] darcs: realloc: resource exhausted (out of memory)

+). The system is a virtualized Linux 2.6.9. -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] Solaris issue: test ! -e test-darcs-2 is failing

Trent W. Buck wrote: Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: test ! -e test-darcs-2 || chmod -R u+rwx test-darcs-2 /bin/sh: test: argument expected It's nicely described in test(1): -e file True if file exists. (Not avail- able

Re: [darcs-users] Solaris find issue...

so and enforce the build. Thanks, Karel Karel Gardas wrote: Folks, just to let you know, I've installed Solaris 10 10/08 (aka Update 6) into VirtualBox and let its find show the result of the famous find test: mkdir test cd test touch foo Foo FOO fOO find . -name '[A-Z

[darcs-users] Solaris issue: test ! -e test-darcs-2 is failing

installed, then just change the code to be run really in bash. Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http

Re: [darcs-users] Solaris find issue...

! ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com

Re: [darcs-users] interesting solaris breakage... makefile-related at all?

@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org

Re: [darcs-users] interesting solaris breakage... makefile-related at all?

Trent W. Buck wrote: Eric Kow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:46:01 +0100, Karel Gardas wrote: I just duplicated your test case and really, this looks like a bug in find. Argh! :-) Sounds like it may be worth reporting (or figuring out what it's not really a bug

Re: [darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Thoughts? ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Eric Kow wrote: On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 21:52:09 +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: The problem here is that buildbot tries to delete directory with 444 permissions. That's going to fail on both Solaris and OpenBSD. My assumption is that it runs well on Linux, but on Unix you probably need writing

Re: [darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Hello, it seems the issue described below in the previous report is still valid and happens. So it's not been resolved as I mistakenly reported few days ago. Thanks, Karel Karel Gardas wrote: Hello, I've just noticed a long running darcs processes consuming 100% CPU here (9 hours of run

Re: [darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Eric Kow wrote: On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 19:55:28 +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: it seems the issue described below in the previous report is still valid and happens. So it's not been resolved as I mistakenly reported few days ago. I'm not sure about the 100% CPU, but one problem I notice

Re: [darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Hi Eric, your fix seems to work, at least it removes busy-loop in darcs update. On the other hand we now do have several failures on Solaris, where on Linux everything seems to be ok. Do you plan to work on it or shall I? In case of me, I can just promise to have a look at this sometimes in next

[darcs-users] What's wrong with darcs on Solaris-based buildbots?

Hello, I've just noticed a long running darcs processes consuming 100% CPU here (9 hours of run). Following buildbots waterfall display it seems it should run update now. The same situation seems to be on zooko's nexenta box. The question is, what's wrong with latest darcs on Solaris? Do you have

[darcs-users] Solaris/x86 buildbot update (ghc 6.8.3 + maybench)

Hi, just a short note: I've updated Solaris/x86 buildbot to GHC 6.8.3 and also installed maybench as Eric requested in the past. Cheers, Karel ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] test_network failing with deadlock

AM, Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, few days ago Zooko asked for curl versions on my Solaris and OpenBSD buildbots. I've replied that not only those are affected by the issue in test_network test. Also linuxes are affected. Today I see that heffalump Linux-? Debian-lenny(ish

[darcs-users] test_network failing with deadlock

going either in curl or in darcs/curl interaction... Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org

Re: [darcs-users] problems in test_network on some buildslaves

___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list

Re: [darcs-users] problems in test_network on some buildslaves

not noted this till your email. Cheers, Karel Karel Gardas wrote: Hi Zooko, I'm afraid I'm reported some time ago that not only my buildbots are affected, but also probably `reinier sloompie'. See its history for more information... Anyway, my solaris does have: -bash-3.2$ curl --version

Re: [darcs-users] darcs and ghc..

script which just executes darcs on all ghc's subprojects with appropriate command. See http://darcs.haskell.org/ghc/darcs-all for more information. Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com

Re: [darcs-users] staging commit ?

a weird behaviour (such as not recording anything whereas I asked it to do it). Thank you Please see darcs rec --help. I guess you might just use darcs rec -a [file*|directory*] you would like to record without asking for confirming particular change. Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas

[darcs-users] Is System.Directory package really required?

Hello, it seems some of recent changes to darcs brings a dependency on System.Directory package. At least that's why compilation of Workaround.hs fails on rtai Linux, jules apollo, zooko virtual2 WXP, karel solaris, reinier sloompie slackware buildslaves. Is this dependency intentional or is it

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

/darcs-devel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

Jules Colding wrote: On 16/06/2008, at 12.01, Karel Gardas wrote: Hello, this is again test_network running forever. In this case for 2 days on Darwin. So we have seen it so far on Darwin, Linux, Solaris and OpenBSD buildbots. My personal bet is that this is issue876. Build 17 has

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on jules apollo Darwin-9.2.2 Mac OS-10.5.3 i386

to get a stack trace of the running Haskell process on Windows? If so, please get one and let compare it with my pstack output on Solaris. Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com

[darcs-users] darcs/testsuite dead-lock?

Hi, I've already needed to interrupt/kill several darcs' testsuite run thanks to the fact they seem to never finish. That's on Solaris and OpenBSD platforms using ghc 6.8.2+ and 6.6.1. Anyway, it seems I'm not the only one seeing this issue. See

Re: [darcs-users] wishlist for darcs 2.1 -- green buildbots

Simon, Simon Marlow wrote: zooko wrote: Next, karel's solaris box fails to compile, with this error message: http://buildbot.darcs.net/builders/karel%20solaris%20Solaris-5.11% 20nevada-79a%20x86_64/builds/43/steps/compile/logs/stdio [ghc] src/OldFastPackedString.o

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on karel openbsd OpenBSD-4.3 i386

-devel mailing list (AUTOMATIC POSTINGS ONLY PLEASE!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs

[darcs-users] darcs patch: workaround OpenBSD sed which does not insert new line

Fri May 23 23:52:21 CEST 2008 Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] * workaround OpenBSD sed which does not insert new line New patches: [workaround OpenBSD sed which does not insert new line Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]**20080523215221] hunk ./tests/pull_compl.sh 35 +if [ `uname` == OpenBSD

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: workaround OpenBSD sed which does not insert new line

David Roundy wrote: On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 09:15:16AM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: Fri May 23 23:52:21 CEST 2008 Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] * workaround OpenBSD sed which does not insert new line This is pretty ugly. I'd rather have a patch that uses perl instead of sed. Indeed

[darcs-users] darcs on ghc repo (new curl seems to be important)

Hello, just to make a noise and record that new curl seems to be really important. I've tried linking darcs head against curl 7.18.0 instead of my system default 7.15.5 and then tried to get the ghc repo by: time darcs get --verbose --partial --repo-name build

[darcs-users] darcs, cache and darcs1 type repo

Hello, am I right that darcs2 while getting sources from the darcs1 repo is not using nor populating darcs cache? i.e. I have set darcs cache as suggested here: http://darcs.net/manual/node5.html, concretely: mkdir -p $HOME/.darcs/cache echo cache:$HOME/.darcs/cache $HOME/.darcs/sources I've

Re: [darcs-users] wishlist for darcs 2.1

Hello, zooko wrote: I totally agree with your list -- performance issues and Windows polish. One particular thing that I'm interested in is scaling darcs up to bigger projects. We have the perfect customer right now -- the GHC team. They have strong demands, cooperate well with us

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on karel opensolaris OpenSolaris-2008.05 nevada-86-rc3 i386

ONLY PLEASE!) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on karel opensolaris OpenSolaris-2008.05 nevada-86-rc3 i386

zooko wrote: On May 21, 2008, at 2:46 PM, Karel Gardas wrote: sorry, but due to this issue in VirtualBox software: http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/1562 -- I'm switching current OpenSolaris buildbot off. Thanks, Karel! But I kind of wonder if this error: http://buildbot.darcs.net

Re: [darcs-users] [darcs-devel] buildbot failure in darcs on karel opensolaris OpenSolaris-2008.05 nevada-86-rc3 i386

zooko wrote: Anyway, if you like to test anything on this broken box, just let me know and I'll test it for you Thank you! I do care about the issue of programs depending on a monotonically increasing gettimeofday when they do not need to. In my opinion it is one of those insidious issues

Re: [darcs-users] the problems with autoconf

be so kind and post here what you have achieved so far? I think the most important is your m4 macro for haskell/curl/ssl test. Perhaps someone will spot the bug in your code or will be able to continue where you have ended. Thanks! Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [darcs-users] the problems with autoconf

for? Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] the problems with autoconf

how is it working. IMHO in this case libcurl test should fail since you will probably need to add some -L for linking phase... Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs

Re: [darcs-users] down with autoconf

Zooko, what's exactly your issue with autoconf? Doesn't simple debugging messages spread all over the code work for you? At least they worked for me so far so I'm curious... Thanks, Karel zooko wrote: Folks: I just spent an entire workday (when I probably should have been doing other

Re: [darcs-users] buildbot update

Jules Colding wrote: Folks: The darcs buildbot is coming along nicely. Various build problems and unit test problems, warnings, etc., have been fixed and several new buildslaves have been added: http://allmydata.org/buildbot-darcs/waterfall May I suggest that you rename the buildslaves

Re: [darcs-users] patch: fix pull_many_files.pl test to search for GNU tar first

David Roundy wrote: On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 09:00:11AM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote: Tue May 6 08:53:21 CEST 2008 Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] * fix pull_many_files.pl test to search for GNU tar first Applied. Thanks! A simpler approach might be to just use the traditional approach

[darcs-users] [GNU/Open]/Solaris support and getSymbolicLinkStatus issue (SOLVED)

Hello, in recent weeks there was some ongoing discussion about darcs Solaris support and about darcs issues related to the broken getSymbolicLinkStatus GHC function on this mailing list. I've gone ahead and give a try to compile GHC (STABLE) myself. After 2 days of failing attempts I've been

[darcs-users] darcs head on Solaris issues.

Hello, I'm just trying darcs head (as of today) on Solaris (SXDE 1/08) and it seems the issues already reported here are still presented. No offens, I just would like to find out latest status of darcs2 on Solaris! For your information, I've got darcs 2.0.0 compiled on Linux and used it to

Re: [darcs-users] darcs head on Solaris issues.

) and then just plain delegating getSymbolicLinkStatus which would use ghc's own getSymbolicLinkStatus? Of course I 100% agree that nice clean patch for ghc's getSymbolicLinkStatus would be the best... Thanks, Karel Karel Gardas wrote: Hello, I'm just trying darcs head (as of today) on Solaris

Re: [darcs-users] considering deletion of this list

-traffic mailing list devoted to darcs questions. David ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http

Re: [darcs-users] fromJust error in darcs-2.0.0

? _ Spell a grand slam in this game where word skill meets World Series. Get in the game. http://club.live.com/word_slugger.aspx?icid=word_slugger_wlhm_admod_april08 -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http

Re: [darcs-users] fromJust error in darcs-2.0.0

___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com

[darcs-users] buildbot for OpenSolaris [was: Re: fromJust error in darcs-2.0.0]

interesting. I may be able to set a zone for Solaris slave, but it seems we first need to get darcs get darcs repo working. i.e. I guess darcs is used to get the latest version on buildbot or am I mistaken? Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd

Re: [darcs-users] fromJust error in darcs-2.0.0

___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs

Re: [darcs-users] Push feedback

was well. -- Richard A. Smith Bitworks, Inc ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http

[darcs-users] How to debug silent dieing of remote darcs?

on local side push hangs forever probably. Question is, how to debug this case of remote darcs dieing? I'm using 1.0.5 release on FC2 (remote) and Debian Sarge (local). Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com

Re: [darcs-users] --set-scripts-executable ignore world flag ?

) groupExecuteMode) see FileSystem.hs Oh, it is linux 2.4.31 on ext3(with user attribute patches), if that makes a difference. I don't know if this might make difference, but is it also possible to test this on plain ext3? Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [darcs-users] --set-scripts-executable ignore world flag ?

to be ready with the fix for David's next RC. Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman

Re: [darcs-users] --set-scripts-executable ignore world flag ?

was invented and written. Cheers, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Re: [darcs-users] Re: set-scripts-executable

the speed improvements are in this release and just found that get (the only thing tested so far) of MICO sources is 50% faster! This is very nice and thanks to all developers working on darcs these days! Thanks, Karel -- Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ObjectSecurity Ltd

what does sysctl do? [was: Re: [darcs-users] OT: Anybody got GHC compiled on Solaris/x86 or even darcs itself?]

emulation affected? Thanks! Karel On Tue, 10 May 2005, Karel Gardas wrote: Hello, I'm just experimenting with solaris 10 on amd64 and would like to know if anybody got GHC compiled on this platform or even darcs itself? So far I've tried GHC 6.4 and 6.2.2 versions but w/o success. FYI: I'm talking