Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Use System.Directory.getTemporaryDirecto... (and 1 more)

2008-05-09 Thread David Roundy
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> As far as I can tell, the behavior of openBinaryTempFile is undocumented >> when it is passed an empty string as a directory. Perhaps we should pass >> "."? > > Oh, I forgot that I had been meaning to replace that with tempdir_

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Use System.Directory.getTemporaryDirecto... (and 1 more)

2008-05-09 Thread Eric Kow
> As far as I can tell, the behavior of openBinaryTempFile is undocumented > when it is passed an empty string as a directory. Perhaps we should pass > "."? Oh, I forgot that I had been meaning to replace that with tempdir_loc (modulo bind). Are we considering it safe to do so now? If not, "." i

Re: [darcs-users] darcs patch: Use System.Directory.getTemporaryDirecto... (and 1 more)

2008-05-09 Thread David Roundy
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 03:09:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Note: I didn't know what to do about mk_stdout_temp > > Fri May 9 15:30:35 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Use System.Directory.getTemporaryDirectory to determine tmp location. > > This is more portable. For i

[darcs-users] darcs patch: Use System.Directory.getTemporaryDirecto... (and 1 more)

2008-05-09 Thread E . Y . Kow
Note: I didn't know what to do about mk_stdout_temp Fri May 9 15:30:35 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Use System.Directory.getTemporaryDirectory to determine tmp location. This is more portable. For instance, it understands Windows's conventions. Fri May 9 15:56:36 BST 2008