Hi
I've just filed a bug report for this [issue1415] so I won't repeat
everything. But basically, the help says to use `darcs amend-record --
edit-description`, which doesn't work. Is there a way to rename a
patch with unrecording it?
Thanks
Ashley
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
Hi,
I have followed the instructions of
http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/HintsAndTips#head-b0e65fffb81623b4862802160f3e1437713d8b59
in order to use scponly to restrict ssh access for a darcs project,
but I am not able to push patches. I'm using darcs 2.2.1 on a Ubuntu
9.04 machine. scponly is
On 4 Apr 2009, at 15:10, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
What you want is the option --edit-long-comment . The mention to
--edit-description is certainly a bug.
Thanks Guillaume. I don't want to change the long comment in this
case (in fact I never use them), just the short description. Is
When you edit the long comment with darcs amend-record
--edit-long-comment , the first line is in fact the name (or short
description) of the patch.
guillaume
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
As noted, you can rename by using darcs amend --edit-long-comment and
changing the top line.
darcs send --edit-description is for editing the body of a darcs patch
email.
It's very hard to remember which is which in the thick of battle. I've
just about got them straight, but each time I use
I would say the page is outdated. I believe it's rather hard to set up
one of those schemes and have it be usable and truly secure. I haven't
heard of anyone who is doing this in practice right now, or even anyone
who succeeded with it in the past.. (pregnant pause)
Is some kind of renaming worth the hassle ?
Such as: using --edit-description for both; or, changing to something
less vague like --edit-comment and --edit-mail.
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
On 4 Apr 2009, at 21:30, Simon Michael wrote:
Is some kind of renaming worth the hassle ?
Such as: using --edit-description for both; or, changing to
something less vague like --edit-comment and --edit-mail.
I say yes. I think it's essential for software to use the most
intuitive
Hi all,
On Sunday 05 April 2009 00:02:39 Ashley Moran wrote:
On 4 Apr 2009, at 21:30, Simon Michael wrote:
Is some kind of renaming worth the hassle ?
Such as: using --edit-description for both; or, changing to
something less vague like --edit-comment and --edit-mail.
I say yes. I
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Don Stewart wrote:
bugfact:
Rumor goes that this is very difficult to do with Darcs. Is this correct?
darcs unpull
Be careful - you cannot revert this! If you want to unpull patches, that
were not distributed so far, you should better call 'darcs get' to get a
Ashley Moran wrote:
On 4 Apr 2009, at 16:23, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
When you edit the long comment with darcs amend-record
--edit-long-comment , the first line is in fact the name (or short
description) of the patch.
Thanks! I tested this and it works.
I find this really
Ashley Moran ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk writes:
I've just filed a bug report for this [issue1415] so I won't repeat
everything. But basically, the help says to use `darcs amend-record
-- edit-description`, which doesn't work. Is there a way to rename a
patch with unrecording it?
It
Ashley Moran ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk writes:
On 4 Apr 2009, at 16:23, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
When you edit the long comment with darcs amend-record
--edit-long-comment , the first line is in fact the name (or short
description) of the patch.
Thanks! I tested this and it works.
I
Simon Michael si...@joyful.com writes:
As noted, you can rename by using darcs amend --edit-long-comment and
changing the top line.
darcs send --edit-description is for editing the body of a darcs patch
email.
It's very hard to remember which is which in the thick of battle. I've
just
Ben Franksen benjamin.frank...@bessy.de writes:
Ashley Moran wrote:
On 4 Apr 2009, at 16:23, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
When you edit the long comment with darcs amend-record
--edit-long-comment , the first line is in fact the name (or short
description) of the patch.
Thanks! I tested
Guillaume Hoffmann guilla...@gmail.com writes:
I should precise my intentions: I want an easy (but not necessary
unbreakable) way to restrict permissions of users solely created to
commit into a darcs repository on a Linux box. [scponly does not work
as advertised on the wiki, nor will it.]
Henning Thielemann lemm...@henning-thielemann.de writes:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Don Stewart wrote:
bugfact:
Rumor goes that this is very difficult to do with Darcs. Is this correct?
darcs unpull
Be careful - you cannot revert this! If you want to unpull patches,
that were not distributed
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Trent W. Buck trentb...@gmail.com wrote:
Guillaume Hoffmann guilla...@gmail.com writes:
* what are you using to restrict user freedom ? scponly, rssh ? a
chroot jail ? nothing ?
The Darcs project itself relies on patch submissions via darcs send
instead of
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Simon Michael wrote:
As noted, you can rename by using darcs amend --edit-long-comment and
changing the top line.
darcs send --edit-description is for editing the body of a darcs patch
email.
It's very hard to remember which is which in the thick of battle. I've
19 matches
Mail list logo
