Re: [darcs-users] referencing in-repo branches

2018-03-07 Thread Ben Franksen
Am 07.03.2018 um 22:10 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch: > Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Ben Franksen: >> [...] > > This sounds just great. I would love to see this implemented. > > Please keep up the good work! Hi Wolfgang Thanks for the encouragement! Cheers Ben _

Re: [darcs-users] referencing in-repo branches

2018-03-07 Thread Wolfgang Jeltsch
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Ben Franksen: > If we choose to add in-repo branches to Darcs, we do /not/ need to be > concerned with branch identifiers! It is enough to able to name > patches to uniquely identify a branch. It doesn't even have to be the > top-most patch, just any

[darcs-users] referencing in-repo branches

2018-03-07 Thread Ben Franksen
Hi All the recent discussions here gave me a much better picture of what kind of features we should strive for when we add in-repo branches. But perhaps I should not (yet) talk about branches. Let us talk instead about "patch sequences". The way Darcs works today is that it knows of exactly one s

Re: [darcs-users] so long and thanks for all the darcs

2018-03-07 Thread Ben Franksen
Am 05.03.2018 um 04:40 schrieb Stephen J. Turnbull: > Executive summary: > > Darcs is an elegant system with a very simple underlying repository > model (set of patches) and an implementation that is faithful to that > model. This makes Darcs easy to understand and use. > > Although git and Merc