On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 07:32:40AM +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> Dear David, Mark, Thorkil and Dmitry:
>
> We would like to relicense the test cases for darcs under something
> more permissive, namely, the MIT license. Do you accept this?
>
> Also: while I'm at it, we aim to spin off parts of the dar
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:41:39 +1000, Trent W.Buck wrote:
> Here's mine. I tested it on HFS+ on Ubuntu. AFAICT all three repo
> formats *have* the problem, but only old-fashioned-inventory catches
> it. Or maybe I've found a separate bug :-)
Well, here's my take on it: there is a bug where ca
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Trent W.Buck wrote:
> Eric Kow wrote:
> Here's mine. I tested it on HFS+ on Ubuntu. AFAICT all three repo
> formats *have* the problem, but only old-fashioned-inventory catches
> it. Or maybe I've found a separate bug :-)
That's really strange: it works for me
Erik Schnetter writes:
> # The Unix classic for creating a file with all zeros
> dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1k count=1024
In that case you might as well make it sparse:
dd bs=1 count=0 seek=1M of=sparsefile
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-user
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Salvatore Insalaco wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Trent W.Buck wrote:
> That's really strange: it works for me on darcs 2 repository on HFS+
> (case insensitive) on Mac OS X:
Just tried on NTFS on Vista: same behaviour that we have on Mac OS X.
That's
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 06:06:52PM +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> > # The Unix classic for creating a file with all zeros
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=file bs=1k count=1024
>
> In that case you might as well make it sparse:
>
> dd bs=1 count=0 seek=1M of=sparsefile
That's not portable. Multipliers
Hi Max and Guillaume:
Could I have comments from the two of you on these changes?
If Mark Stosberg is paying attention, this may be a good one for you to
comment on too (did I already ask you if you wanted to join the
Marketing Team? after 3, I'll likely assume the team can take care of
its own r
Hi Eric.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Eric Kow wrote:
> Dear David, Mark, Thorkil and Dmitry:
>
> We would like to relicense the test cases for darcs under something
> more permissive, namely, the MIT license. Do you accept this?
>
I accept it.
> Also: while I'm at it, we aim to spin off
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 23:22:13 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> As an update on this, I've applied Ben's patch, but now make website
> on darcs.net is stuck on this autoconf/GHC 6.6 build error:
>
> http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2009-April/018911.html
Just following up on this. I feel
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 19:03:19 +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> Anybody know how to fix this? Seems like it should be fairly
> straightforward
>
> [ghc] src/Darcs/Patch/Depends.o
>
> src/Darcs/Patch/Depends.hs:188:17:
> Overlapping instances for Monad (Either MissingPatch)
> arising from use
Eric Kow writes:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 00:31:52 -0700, Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> A do-over of the one-big-patch I made some time ago. I've tried to
>> put the most contentious changes last, so that they won't kibosh the
>> others due to dependency issues.
>>
>> I also refrained from rewriting
Trent Buck writes:
> Nod. I had forgotten about Windows, and I couldn't remember if Unix
> SSH clients like dropbear had an equivalent of ssh_config.
ssh -R 2000:localhost:22 somewhere.else
SSH_PORT=2000 darcs get localhost:some/repo
: - )
Yours,
Petr.
--
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net |
I'm fine with the test cases I've written for darcs being relicensed,
but not the source code.
David
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Eric Kow wrote:
> Dear David, Mark, Thorkil and Dmitry:
>
> We would like to relicense the test cases for darcs under something
> more permissive, namely, the MI
On 5/16/2009 7:30, Trent W. Buck wrote:
I dropped a copy at http://code.haskell.org/~twb/tmp/{before,after}.html
if people with other engines want to compare them.
For the most part it looks good. I don't really care strongly for the
max-width and would be fine with letting the document flow t
On May 14, 2009, at 17:09 PM, Jason Dagit wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Simon Michael
wrote:
Nit pick: shouldn't this just be called darcs rebase ?
...
http://bugs.darcs.net/msg5565
With the particular quote: "I would not call anything in darcs
rebase."
I read that message,
Trent Buck added the comment:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:27:29PM -, Petr Ročkai wrote:
> ssh -R 2000:localhost:22 somewhere.else
> SSH_PORT=2000 darcs get localhost:some/repo
Under what circumstances is that preferable to "darcs get
somewhere.else:some/repo"?
Now, if you were connecting to
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Salvatore Insalaco wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Trent W.Buck wrote:
>> Here's mine. I tested it on HFS+ on Ubuntu. AFAICT all three repo
>> formats *have* the problem, but only old-fashioned-inventory
>> catches it. Or maybe I've found a se
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
> On May 14, 2009, at 17:09 PM, Jason Dagit wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Simon Michael wrote:
>>>
>>> Nit pick: shouldn't this just be called darcs rebase ?
>
> ...
>>
>> http://bugs.darcs.net/msg5565
>>
>> With the part
18 matches
Mail list logo
