Re: [darcs-users] [issue1459] Remove support for SSH_PORT, DARCS_SSH, DARCS_SCP, DARCS_SFTP
Trent Buck writes: > Nod. I had forgotten about Windows, and I couldn't remember if Unix > SSH clients like dropbear had an equivalent of ssh_config. ssh -R 2000:localhost:22 somewhere.else SSH_PORT=2000 darcs get localhost:some/repo : - ) Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
Re: [darcs-users] [issue1459] Remove support for SSH_PORT, DARCS_SSH, DARCS_SCP, DARCS_SFTP
On Monday 11 May 2009, Trent Buck wrote: > > New submission from Trent Buck : > > Currently Darcs provides an application-specific way to set SSH > settings. Does anyone actually use these? If they do, why isn't > ssh_config(5) a viable and superior alternative? I guess they are useful if you use an alternate ssh implementation (like putty on windows) that doesn't have ssh_config. -- Dan ___ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users