Re: [darcs-users] [issue1459] Remove support for SSH_PORT, DARCS_SSH, DARCS_SCP, DARCS_SFTP

2009-05-16 Thread Petr Rockai
Trent Buck  writes:
> Nod.  I had forgotten about Windows, and I couldn't remember if Unix
> SSH clients like dropbear had an equivalent of ssh_config.

ssh -R 2000:localhost:22 somewhere.else
SSH_PORT=2000 darcs get localhost:some/repo

: - )

Yours,
   Petr.

-- 
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com
 http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net

"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
 indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
 -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users


Re: [darcs-users] [issue1459] Remove support for SSH_PORT, DARCS_SSH, DARCS_SCP, DARCS_SFTP

2009-05-11 Thread Dan Pascu
On Monday 11 May 2009, Trent Buck wrote:
> 
> New submission from Trent Buck :
> 
> Currently Darcs provides an application-specific way to set SSH
> settings.  Does anyone actually use these?  If they do, why isn't
> ssh_config(5) a viable and superior alternative?

I guess they are useful if you use an alternate ssh implementation (like 
putty on windows) that doesn't have ssh_config.

-- 
Dan
___
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users