On 03/07/2018 07:11 PM, Ben Franksen wrote:
> If we choose to add in-repo branches to Darcs, we do /not/ need to be
> concerned with branch identifiers! It is enough to able to name patches
> to uniquely identify a branch. It doesn't even have to be the top-most
> patch, just any patch in the initi
Am 07.03.2018 um 22:10 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Ben Franksen:
>> [...]
>
> This sounds just great. I would love to see this implemented.
>
> Please keep up the good work!
Hi Wolfgang
Thanks for the encouragement!
Cheers
Ben
_
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 19:11 +0100 schrieb Ben Franksen:
> If we choose to add in-repo branches to Darcs, we do /not/ need to be
> concerned with branch identifiers! It is enough to able to name
> patches to uniquely identify a branch. It doesn't even have to be the
> top-most patch, just any
Hi All
the recent discussions here gave me a much better picture of what kind
of features we should strive for when we add in-repo branches. But
perhaps I should not (yet) talk about branches. Let us talk instead
about "patch sequences".
The way Darcs works today is that it knows of exactly one s