I think we mix up 2 (or 3) different things in this topic. Let's say
a contributor wants to implement some feature:
First some discussion should probably happen, for example other
developers can help with pointers on how said feature can and should be
integrated into DT core. I don't see any need
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 14:12 -0300, Moritz Moeller a écrit :
> But I agree with parent that it is not the right tool to discuss big
> changes.
> IRC has no history. IRC has no message threads.
> That's why I mentioned NNTP.
My first best is GitHub Issues.
You create an enhancement request
On 17.4.19 09:16, johannes hanika wrote:
i second the 'getting old' bit. and i really like IRC.
Maybe you misunderstood my message's intend?
Yes, I too prefer IRC over any 'modern' chat client.
But I agree with parent that it is not the right tool to discuss big
changes.
IRC has no
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 08:47 -0400, Mark Feit a écrit :
> PRs shouldn't exist until there's code to be pulled. Sometimes there's
> discussion about a project before anyone writes a single line.
I just don't agree. Many nice dt features won't have been created
otherwise. Many people like
On 4/16/19 1:51 PM, rawfiner wrote:
Using github by commenting directly on PRs
I'm in favor of this with some modifications with the mailing list as a
second choice. IRC is too ephemeral without logging and conversations
can go on for days and end up intermixed with other topics, making it
On 4/16/19 11:46 PM, Moritz Moeller wrote:
> There is this thing called 'a news server' which has all of below
> but has infinite history (for free) and you can actually see who
> replied to whom before even opening/deciding to read a message.
>
> That feature alone makes a news server with a
i second the 'getting old' bit. and i really like IRC. i could never
get the hang of these fancy websites that force you to use a mouse.
for slack at least there used to be an IRC bridge. it seems mattermost
may be an alternative that does support IRC, for those of us who
insist on animated gifs
Hi,
Am 16.04.19 um 19:51 schrieb rawfiner:
Currently, the place where big changes should be discussed is IRC
(according to houz, as I have not seen this information anywhere, which
is problematic as new contributors may make big changes, so they have at
least to be able to know where is the
There is this thing called 'a news server' which has all of below but
has infinite history (for free) and you can actually see who replied to
whom before even opening/deciding to read a message.
That feature alone makes a news server with a decent client (e.g.
Thunderbird) a thousand times
Hi,
I have one addition to the list.
I haven't been part of the dev team so I'm not offended, if my proposal
won't be considered.
We have been using in our company's context slack for discussions and
information exchange. There are also other similar alternatives available.
pros:
– discussions
Dear all,
Currently, the place where big changes should be discussed is IRC
(according to houz, as I have not seen this information anywhere, which is
problematic as new contributors may make big changes, so they have at least
to be able to know where is the place to discuss things).
I think IRC
11 matches
Mail list logo
