Re: [darktable-dev] Wrong lens detected

It seems that some informations are from the right lens and other for the wrong one. Probably these informations ARE in the file. Maybe Sigma is trying to fool the Canon body to get some optical corrections from it? 2017-12-04 22:43 GMT+01:00 Marc Mascré : > That is completely

Re: [darktable-dev] Debugging of darktable.

Hi Roman, Thank you for your quick answer :-) On 2017-12-04 22:34, Roman Lebedev wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Jørn Villesen Christensen wrote: I have been trying to debug darktable (with gdb) but without any luck. It's not designed to be runnable without

Re: [darktable-dev] Debugging of darktable.

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Jørn Villesen Christensen wrote: > Hi there, > > I have been trying to debug darktable (with gdb) but without any luck. > My main problem of running darktable from the build directory is that it > will not load any modules. I have tried

[darktable-dev] Debugging of darktable.

Hi there, I have been trying to debug darktable (with gdb) but without any luck. My main problem of running darktable from the build directory is that it will not load any modules. I have tried to play with --datadir, --moduledir, and symlinks, but without any luck. I can get the UI up 'n'

Re: [darktable-dev] Are OS X build instructions up to date? (i.e. are official darktable .dmg builds being produced as described in the wiki article?)

https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/packaging/macosx/BUILD.txt On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:44:01 +0200 Sarge Borsch wrote: > https://redmine.darktable.org/projects/darktable/wiki/Darktable_on_OS_X > I thought that I'd like to test darktable from the

Re: [darktable-dev] darktable 2.4.0rc0 released

hi, On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Terry Duell wrote: > On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 03:10:51 +1100, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > >> we're proud to announce the first release candidate for the upcoming 2.4 >> series of darktable, 2.4.0rc0! >> >> the github release is