Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread Terry Duell
Hello All, On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:42:54 +1000, Terry Duell wrote: Hello, I've just built the current master (1886-ga2f84373b) on Fedora 30, using my usual rpmbuild spec file, and find that it is very slow,far. Some more info that may help with this issue. I just downgraded to a build

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread Terry Duell
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:34:03 +1000, rawfiner wrote: If it is only zooming, No not just zooming, all actions seem much slower, particularly noticeable with profiled denoise non-local means, I rarely use the wavelets. Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell

Re: Fwd: Fwd: [darktable-dev] Standardization of the writing of mouse interactions in the user manual

2019-09-27 Thread openHAB . Doc
Hi Bruce,   don‘t worry! I didn't take your first answer personally. Apology accepted!   Much more important is that we are working on the same thing - improving the darktable documentation!   In the meantime I have looked at user manuals of applications with mouse interactions which I

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread thokster
It's only with wavelets mode Am 27.09.19 um 09:54 schrieb rawfiner: Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 09:50, thokster > a écrit : Hi, on my Ubuntu system it seems to be both. It's less slow when using the button but still slow with denoiseprofile. darktable

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread hanno
Right. We must make sure the fedora people change that. Stock dt on fedora is a Desaster. Unfortunately we will have f31 before dt3.  On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:04 AM +0200, "Andreas Schneider" wrote: On Friday, 27 September 2019 01:42:54 CEST Terry Duell wrote: > Hello, Hi, >

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread rawfiner
Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 09:50, thokster a écrit : > Hi, > on my Ubuntu system it seems to be both. It's less slow when using the > button but still slow with denoiseprofile. > darktable -d opencl says: > > 369,710244 [opencl_denoiseprofile] couldn't enqueue kernel! -52, devid 0 > 369,710270

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread thokster
Hi, on my Ubuntu system it seems to be both. It's less slow when using the button but still slow with denoiseprofile. darktable -d opencl says: 369,710244 [opencl_denoiseprofile] couldn't enqueue kernel! -52, devid 0 369,710270 [opencl_pixelpipe] could not run module 'denoiseprofile' on gpu.

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread rawfiner
If it is only zooming, I guess this may be relared to the problem that computations are triggered twice when zooming with the mouse wheel, which doubles the processing time. If you zoom with the button on the up-left part of the darkroom, do you experience the same issues? rawfiner Le ven. 27

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread Terry Duell
Hello Andreas, On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:03:54 +1000, Andreas Schneider wrote: On Friday, 27 September 2019 01:42:54 CEST Terry Duell wrote: Hello, Hi, I've just built the current master (1886-ga2f84373b) on Fedora 30, using my usual rpmbuild spec file, and find that it is very slow,

Re: [darktable-dev] Current dt master very slow

2019-09-27 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Friday, 27 September 2019 01:42:54 CEST Terry Duell wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I've just built the current master (1886-ga2f84373b) on Fedora 30, using > my usual rpmbuild spec file, and find that it is very slow, particularly > noticeable when zooming the image or applying noise reduction, it