Thanks a lot for your answer!
Le mer. 12 déc. 2018 à 22:24, johannes hanika a écrit :
> heya,
>
> sorry for the late answer, usual madness. but i think you're raising a
> few important points here. let me try to answer some of it:
>
> No problem for the delay, this is clearly not an urgent matte
Le mer. 12 déc. 2018 à 09:34, Björn Sozumschein
a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> that's a really good question! I cannot understand that also, as the
> comments are not very useful unfortunately
> Is it in some way related to issue
> https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10704
>
>
It is possible that it is
heya,
sorry for the late answer, usual madness. but i think you're raising a
few important points here. let me try to answer some of it:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 4:04 AM rawfiner wrote:
> For wavelet codes, there is a 2x multiplier on B and R channels, while it is
> not the case for the anscombe
Hi,
that's a really good question! I cannot understand that also, as the
comments are not very useful unfortunately
Is it in some way related to issue
https://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10704
best,
Bjoern
Am Do., 6. Dez. 2018 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb rawfiner :
> Hi,
>
> Looking at the code o
Hi,
Looking at the code of denoise profile, I noticed a few things that seems
strange to me concerning the anscombe transform.
For wavelet codes, there is a 2x multiplier on B and R channels, while it
is not the case for the anscombe transform of non local means:
const float wb[3] = { // twice
