On 11/08/2012 04:53 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
> /me needs to try this before complaining. but will this randomly scale
> my images with sub-par algorithms the way google plus does it? to make
> them all look like taken with an iphone? after gomgom spent so much
> time to make our exports look good
/me needs to try this before complaining. but will this randomly scale
my images with sub-par algorithms the way google plus does it? to make
them all look like taken with an iphone? after gomgom spent so much
time to make our exports look good? just double checking :)
-jo
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at
Hi,
I needed support for fullscreen and image scaling for the dt web
gallery, which the lightbox2 javascript library doesn't support.
So I have switched the implementation to use the LightZAP library
implementation.
Please, try out pull request
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pul
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:13:23 Michal Babej wrote:
> The bandwidth and storage of server-side is one thing. The client-side
> bandwith is another. Considering the RAW sizes of common cameras, a
> photographer would need gigabytes of transfers from the tablet and back
> just for *one* photo session, wh
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012 20:33:15 +1300
[email protected] wrote:
> Moving darktable to cloud and offer it as an online DAM service is
> nice, but setting the bandwidth, and the storage of RAW photos would
> have huge cost, so it must be a paid subscription service.
The bandwidth and sto
On 08.11.2012, at 7:48, [email protected] wrote:
> Nowadays many photographers will take their tablet along (they may
> think laptops are too heavy..) to their photography assignments,
> and do the postprocessing during their trip, as well as demonstrating
> their client some post
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Ammon Riley wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Ivan Tarozzi wrote:
>> Il 08/11/2012 05:57, [email protected] ha scritto:
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:49 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:30 PM, wrote:
> Finally, we ha
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Ivan Tarozzi wrote:
> Il 08/11/2012 05:57, [email protected] ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:49 PM, johannes hanika wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:30 PM, wrote:
Finally, we have got the 1.1rc1 dmg image. Thanks heaps! However at
>>
Remember that (at least for this release) MacOS port are supposed to
be experimental... so I don't think it's really a problem if there is
this warning.
if our MacOS base is big enough when we reach our next stable, it
might be worth considering... though I also disagree in principle for
giving Ap
