Re: [darktable-devel] Should darktable and darktable-devel mailing list move to a sourceforge forum?

2013-03-09 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, wrote: > ...vs a list, which can be difficult to search? Are we talking about a 1:100 possibility or something that's real and biting in the arse? :) Both www.mail-archive.com and gmane.org alread index darktable-devel@. How many more mirrors do you need?

Re: [darktable-devel] Should darktable and darktable-devel mailing list move to a sourceforge forum?

2013-03-09 Thread kcleung
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, johannes hanika wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM, wrote: >> both darktable and darktable-devel mailing lists have high volumes, >> and it can be difficult to find threads/topics quickly out of the very >> large archive. >> >> So I guess perhaps we should

Re: [darktable-devel] Should darktable and darktable-devel mailing list move to a sourceforge forum?

2013-03-09 Thread johannes hanika
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 3:07 PM, wrote: > both darktable and darktable-devel mailing lists have high volumes, > and it can be difficult to find threads/topics quickly out of the very > large archive. > > So I guess perhaps we should migrate both list to a phpbb no. > forum, which > is hosted as

[darktable-devel] Should darktable and darktable-devel mailing list move to a sourceforge forum?

2013-03-09 Thread kcleung
both darktable and darktable-devel mailing lists have high volumes, and it can be difficult to find threads/topics quickly out of the very large archive. So I guess perhaps we should migrate both list to a phpbb forum, which is hosted as a sourceforge app: You can find an example on the free-cad

[darktable-devel] tarball for 1.1.4

2013-03-09 Thread johannes hanika
hey all, i've uploaded the tarball for the stable branch, 1.1.4, which pascal maintained very thankfully over the last couple of weeks: https://sourceforge.net/projects/darktable/files/darktable/1.1/darktable-1.1.4.tar.xz/download which represent the tag `release-1.1.4' in git. release notes and

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 09.03.2013 17:19, schrieb Pascal Obry: > > Ulrich, >> Mmh, maybe a problem with my thumbnail cache. After removing it, all >> seems fine now. > > Good to hear! > > I have just implemented your suggestion: > Really cool now! Thanks. Ulrich >> * when pasting I am only offered with the iops that

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Pascal Obry
Ulrich, > Mmh, maybe a problem with my thumbnail cache. After removing it, all > seems fine now. Good to hear! I have just implemented your suggestion: > * when pasting I am only offered with the iops that have been > selected during partial-copy. -- Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78)

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 09.03.2013 13:32, schrieb Pascal Obry: > Le 09/03/2013 13:14, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit : >> OK, I re-checked. Looks indeed like the iops get applied. However, the >> thumbnail is not updated, so I don't see the change until I enter >> darkroom mode. Even when I return to lighttable I still have th

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Pascal Obry
Le 09/03/2013 13:14, Ulrich Pegelow a écrit : > OK, I re-checked. Looks indeed like the iops get applied. However, the > thumbnail is not updated, so I don't see the change until I enter > darkroom mode. Even when I return to lighttable I still have the old > thumbnails. On my side the paste or pa

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 09.03.2013 13:09, schrieb Pascal Obry: > > Ulrich, > >> Nope. Doesn't work here. I don't get the error message any more, but >> partial-pasting a partial-copied history stack does nothing, regardless >> if I deselect any iop or leave all of them selected. > > Working on my side. I just tested it

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Pascal Obry
Ulrich, > Nope. Doesn't work here. I don't get the error message any more, but > partial-pasting a partial-copied history stack does nothing, regardless > if I deselect any iop or leave all of them selected. Working on my side. I just tested it again. Maybe due to the current selection bug I hav

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 09.03.2013 10:34, schrieb Pascal Obry: > > Ulrich, > >> There seems to be something severely broken with that feature anyhow. >> Doing a partial copy followed by a partial paste fails more often than >> it works. I get an error message "can't copy history out of unaltered >> image" and no change

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Pascal Obry
Ulrich, > There seems to be something severely broken with that feature anyhow. > Doing a partial copy followed by a partial paste fails more often than > it works. I get an error message "can't copy history out of unaltered > image" and no changes are applied. This should now be fixed. Pasca

Re: [darktable-devel] lt selection broken

2013-03-09 Thread Pascal Obry
Johannes, > i still think we shouldn't break fluxbox if we don't have to (but i'm > not using it myself which doesn't help the priority..). Ok, I propose to revert the commit then and let people using fluxbox step in to fix this. As I'm not using fluxbox either I can't help. -- Pascal Obry /

Re: [darktable-devel] regression needs fixing for the release

2013-03-09 Thread Pascal Obry
Ulrich, > There seems to be something severely broken with that feature anyhow. > Doing a partial copy followed by a partial paste fails more often than > it works. I get an error message "can't copy history out of unaltered > image" and no changes are applied. I can reproduce, I'll have a loo