heya,
sorry for the lag, and thanks for the presets. those graphs and the PSNR
values look excellent. pushed to git master :)
cheers,
jo
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:52 AM, John N Pham wrote:
> Ran some benchmarking with the below presets from
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4xh3XYXDK_Ta
Ran some benchmarking with the below presets from
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4xh3XYXDK_TaFNObVdwaThOVTQ/edit?usp=sharing
compiled into my copy of darktable:
{"Canon EOS 70D iso 100", "Canon", "Canon EOS 70D",
100, {1.02366555927774e-05, 4.71336587334147e-06,
9.4151830
I reran the script a few times obtaining the following:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4xh3XYXDK_TbnVWT3ZKSkVxOVE/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4xh3XYXDK_TaFNObVdwaThOVTQ/edit?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4xh3XYXDK_TYVBrRm56LWlETDQ/edit?usp=sharing
The sec
hi,
thanks for those.
your images starting ~ iso 2500 are a little bit on the dark side. that
means the dark pixels are so many compared to the rest that they dominate
the curve, so the fit for those iso and higher are off a little, the one at
iso 12800 being the worst.
the variance stabilizatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi John,
just to make it clear: I'm no developer of darktable myself.
Am 30.10.2013 06:53, schrieb John N Pham:
> Oops, correction, the presets should be:
> [data]
Thanks. Great that you did it. Hopefully a lot more profiles can be
shipped with the n
Oops, correction, the presets should be:
{"Canon EOS 70D iso 100", "Canon", "Canon EOS 70D",
100, {8.44345821677586e-06, 3.84995930291335e-06,
6.54462883339171e-06}, {6.79520904867053e-08, 5.06778223382642e-08,
6.35866223026098e-08}},
{"Canon EOS 70D iso 125", "Canon"
Hi all,
I ran through the profiling instructions posted at
http://www.darktable.org/2012/12/profiling-sensor-and-photon-noise/
for the Canon 70D. The generated tarball with the images and PDFs are
at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4xh3XYXDK_TYUtua2hfNUl3YVU/edit?usp=sharing
The presets are:
{
