Hallöchen!
jeremy rosen writes:
> hmm, wouldn't that tool make more sense as part of lensfun rather
> than DT ?
In the suggested form, yes.
> [...]
>
> A tool that helped/automated lens profiling would be awesome,
> though it would make more sense as an add-on like our
> noise-profiler rather t
hmm, wouldn't that tool make more sense as part of lensfun rather than DT ?
we have seen with profiled-denoise that DT is in a very good position to
collect hardware data from our users... probably in a better position than
projects like ufraw or lensfun...
A tool that helped/automated lens profi
Hallöchen!
Daniel J Blueman writes:
> In my thesis a while back [1], I developed a strong algorithm and
> tool [2] to automatically generate LCA correction data from an
> image. These correction values hold for the given set of lens
> parameters usually encoded in the image's EXIF fields.
I appr
Daniel,
I am not one of the main devs, but I personally would really like to
have better possibilities for CA correction overall. You have seen that
there is also the "Auto CA correction"? It was ported from rawtherapee
[1]. As far as I understood it corrects TCA only, and does so by scaling
color
On 31 March 2013 16:48, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> In my thesis a while back [1], I developed a strong algorithm and tool
> [2] to automatically generate LCA correction data from an image. These
> correction values hold for the given set of lens parameters usually
> encoded in the image's EXIF fiel
In my thesis a while back [1], I developed a strong algorithm and tool
[2] to automatically generate LCA correction data from an image. These
correction values hold for the given set of lens parameters usually
encoded in the image's EXIF fields.
I wanted feedback onsome ideas to bring this tool to
