Am 28.10.2013 21:46, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> Ah ha .! The main group show version '0' the errant item shows
> version '2'.
>
> Should I try to edit it?
>
> In the sort procedure should not the 'filename' always be used as a
> secondary key?
Right, we should revise the keys accordin
Ah ha .! The main group show version '0' the errant item shows
version '2'.
Should I try to edit it?
In the sort procedure should not the 'filename' always be used as a
secondary key?
David
On 13-10-28 09:23 PM, Ulrich Pegelow wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> no full explanation, but could you
Hi David,
no full explanation, but could you have a look at the version number (is
now displayed as part of the image information) and see if this might
shed some light on the issue?
Ulrich
Am 28.10.2013 21:10, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> I have a collection of 50 images on my screen. They
I have a collection of 50 images on my screen. They all have the same tags.
A group of 5 out of those images were shot consecutively and have
adjacent file numbers. They also are all rated 4 star and carry a blue
lable.
Sort by filename puts all the 5 images together also sort by color label.
s
